Australian workplace law decisions — 2026
Every published Fair Work Commission, Federal Court, Federal Circuit & Family Court, and Fair Work Ombudsman decision from 2026 in our corpus, in plain English. Sorted by date.
Top topics in 2026
All decisions
← Back to the full corpusB.M.D. Constructions Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (No 4)
B.M.D. Constructions Pty Ltd sought to strike out paragraphs in a defence filed by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) regarding alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act and the Competition and Consumer Act. The CFMEU had pleaded 'it does not know' in response to B.M.D.'s allegations concerning the attendance of CFMEU officials at a construction site. B.M.D. argued this was an abuse of process, claiming the information needed for a responsive plea was available to the CFMEU. The Federal Court (Meagher J) made orders striking out those paragraphs in February 2026.
the Applicant v Roadworx Surfacing Pty Ltd
The Applicant, a WHS & QA Compliance Manager/Officer, sued Roadworx Surfacing Pty Ltd in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), alleging adverse action under s 340 of the Fair Work Act. She claimed her employment termination was due to exercising workplace rights between August 2024 and January 15, 2025. Roadworx terminated the Applicant’s employment on January 16, 2025, with pay in lieu of notice, and again on January 21, 2025, for alleged misconduct. The primary judge found the Applicant had exercised a workplace right and proposed to exercise another, but the termination wasn't due to those actions.
Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (Administration Extension Application)
The Transport Workers’ Union (TWU) brought proceedings against Qantas Airways Limited and Qantas Ground Services Pty Ltd regarding an unlawful outsourcing decision made in late 2020. Following a lengthy legal process, including reinstatement applications and compensation assessments, the Court had previously set a deadline for distributing funds to affected workers. The Administrator of the settlement scheme is now seeking orders varying those deadlines due to delays in the administration of compensation payments, citing issues like unexpectedly large numbers of independent medical examinations.
Qube Ports Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
the Applicant worked for Qube Ports Pty Ltd in Dampier, Western Australia, changing roles from Guaranteed Wage Employee to Variable Salary Employee and then to Provisional Full Time Salaried Employee. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union claimed Qube failed to pay overtime correctly under the Qube Ports Pty Ltd Port of Dampier Enterprise Agreement 2020. An industrial magistrate initially ruled in favour of the union, finding the Applicant was entitled to overtime at a 'Supplementary Employees' hourly rate once he reached 1820 hours annually, regardless of his employment category during the year.
the Applicant v Fair Work Ombudsman
the Applicant appealed decisions made against him regarding Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd (FTM), a massage business he directed. The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) initially found FTM and the Respondent had contravened the Fair Work Act, including underpaying employees classified as Health Professional Level 1. A later decision imposed penalties. the Applicant represented himself at trial and argued issues with evidentiary rules and potential bias from the primary judge.
the Applicant v WS Remedial Group (NSW) Pty Ltd
Matthew Jackson commenced proceedings against WS Remedial Group (NSW) Pty Ltd, Sharn Piper, and Waterstop Solutions (NSW) Pty Ltd alleging adverse action, breach of contract, and other workplace-related issues following an incident on July 30, 2025. He initially filed a general protections application with the Fair Work Commission (FWC), which was not resolved through conciliation. The certificate allowing court proceedings was issued on November 11, 2025. Jackson's originating application and statement of claim were lodged one day late, on November 26, 2025. He subsequently sought an extension of time to file.
the Applicant v Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 4)
This case, Gall v Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 4), concerns a class action lawsuit brought before the Federal Court of Australia. The Applicant, Mr Gall, and other employees of Domino’s franchisees alleged that Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law. They claimed this conduct caused them loss and damage, specifically unpaid award entitlements. The case also examined whether a clause in a certified agreement could be inconsistent with the Fair Work Act 2009.
DP World (Fremantle) Ltd v Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
DP World (Fremantle) Ltd proposed relocating quay crane drivers from the crane cabin to a remote desk, allowing them to operate cranes using joysticks and driver assist features. This project, known as the Remote Quay Crane Project (RQC), aims to improve efficiency but raised concerns about job security and adherence to the DP World Fremantle Enterprise Agreement 2024. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (MUA) argued that the changes triggered provisions in Appendix 4 of the agreement related to 'significant change to the mode of operation,' particularly concerning automation. DP World contended these provisions didn't apply.
Ardeen Pty Ltd v Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association
Ardeen Pty Ltd (McDonald's franchisees) and two related companies sought judicial review of a Fair Work Commission (FWC) decision granting a 'supported bargaining authorisation' to the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA). This authorisation compelled them and their approximately 4,500 employees to bargain together for a multi-enterprise agreement. The FWC’s decision meant they couldn't negotiate separate enterprise agreements. The applicants argued the FWC misconstrued legislation and failed to consider relevant factors like competitive disadvantages.
the Applicant v Peabody Energy Australia PCI Mine Management Pty Ltd (Leave to Appeal)
The Applicant sought leave to amend her originating application and statement of claim in a proceeding relating to alleged adverse action by Peabody Energy Australia PCI Mine Management Pty Ltd and related entities. The claims arise from her employment at the Coppabella Coal Mine. Following an initial interlocutory application, the primary judge made orders regarding the filing of documents. The Applicant subsequently sent additional documents to the court and parties, which were approved for filing. The primary judge dismissed the application but granted provisional leave to file a further amended statement of claim with limitations. Peabody Energy sought costs related to the failed amendment application.
the Applicant v Melbourne Symphony Orchestra Pty Ltd (Liability)
the Applicant, a concert pianist, commenced legal action against the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra (MSO) and the Respondent, the MSO's Chief Operating Officer. This followed the Applicant making statements about Israel committing war crimes during a piano recital in August 2024. The MSO subsequently cancelled his upcoming performance, sent a message to attendees explaining the cancellation, attempted to reinstate him with conditions regarding onstage statements, and published a statement about the cancelled concert. the Applicant alleges these actions constituted adverse action under the Fair Work Act.
WorkPac Pty Ltd v Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation
WorkPac Pty Ltd, a company employing workers in the coal mining industry, disputes how levies for long service leave are calculated for its eligible employees. The Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation administers the scheme and initially claimed WorkPac had underpaid levies. This case concerns the calculation of 'eligible wages' and 'base rate of pay' for 10 sample employees during a period from July 2012 to December 2023, focusing on whether rostered or ordinary hours should be used in calculations.
TESA Group Pty Ltd v Mining and Energy Union
TESA Group Pty Ltd and two related companies appealed a Federal Court decision regarding a judicial review application. The appeal concerned whether a Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission should have recused themselves from a case involving the Mining and Energy Union. The appellant argued that the Deputy President was biased due to their past parliamentary involvement, relying on extracts from Hansard (records of parliament) as evidence. The respondent contended that these extracts were inadmissible due to parliamentary privilege.
the Applicant v Whistle Funds Management Company Pty Ltd
the Applicant initially worked as an independent contractor for Whistle Funds Management Company Pty Ltd from 2012. From July 2017, he held a role as Fund Manager and later became Managing Director in April 2021. the Applicant commenced proceedings against both Whistle Funds (the first respondent) and the Second Respondent, alleging he was misclassified as an independent contractor when he should have been considered an employee. He sought entitlements including accrued annual leave, superannuation contributions, long service leave, and compensation for unfair dismissal.
the Applicant v H&M Hennes & Mauritz Pty Ltd
Javana Johnson commenced proceedings against H&M Hennes & Mauritz Pty Ltd (H&M) in February 2026, alleging general protections under the Fair Work Act. Shortly after, H&M filed an interlocutory application seeking suppression and non-publication orders to prevent media reporting of the case documents. This application was made without argument before a Registrar who made interim orders including a suppression order. The applicant’s solicitor had previously received communications from H&M indicating they would defend the case fully and were unconcerned about media reporting.
FWO v GCH Vic Park Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against GCH Vic Park Pty Ltd and Jay Patel. The case involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. The decision was made on June 25, 2026.
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v GC Crane Hire Pty Ltd as Trustee for GA Caelli Discretionary Trust
Leonard Auld and Peter McHenry were employees of GC Crane Hire, a crane hire business. They were made redundant on September 27, 2023. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (the Union) alleges that GC Crane Hire breached the Enterprise Agreement (EA), resulting in underpayments and other issues related to their termination. GC Crane Hire admits some of the underpayment conduct but disputes certain aspects of the claims regarding notice periods, redundancy payments, and accrued leave entitlements. The dispute involves interpreting clauses within the EA concerning notice periods, severance pay, personal/carer’s leave, and 'waiting time' entitlements.
the Applicant v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2)
The Applicant worked for the Commonwealth (Centrelink and Child Support Agency) from 2013 to 2021. She raised concerns about workplace issues, including the behaviour of a colleague, Omar Bahemia. The Commonwealth had complaints management policies in place. The Applicant initially held an irregular/intermittent employee role before transitioning to an APS3 position. A personal relationship with her colleague occurred between 2014 and 2016. She commenced two proceedings against the Commonwealth in 2022, concerning how her complaints were handled.
FWO v the Respondent t/as Earthcare Urban Farming
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took action against the Respondent for non-compliance with a compliance notice and failing to provide payslips. The details of the specific breaches are not outlined in this document.
the Applicant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) in March 2025, alleging her dismissal from the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (the Bank) was unlawful. A settlement was reached where the Bank agreed to pay the Applicant an amount equivalent to six weeks' pay, and the Applicant signed a deed of release, which included clauses releasing the Bank from claims and indemnifying them against future claims. The Applicant subsequently filed an appeal in the Federal Court of Australia, which was initially treated as an application for leave to appeal due to procedural issues.
the Applicant v Beiler Constructions Pty Ltd as trustee for Fox Trading Trust
the Applicant, a carpenter apprentice employed by Beiler Constructions Pty Ltd, brought claims against the company and its director, alleging sexual harassment and underpayment of wages. She also claimed adverse action related to her removal from a worksite. The Applicant alleged two colleagues engaged in unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature and that she was removed from a site due to a relationship with another employee. The employer denied the allegations but later conceded vicarious liability if the harassment occurred.
FWO v Printpot Pty Ltd
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against Printpot Pty Ltd. The nature of the proceedings involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. The decision was made on June 10, 2026.
the Applicant v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
The Applicant brought proceedings against the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) alleging violations of several Australian laws, including the Fair Work Act 2009, the Privacy Act 1988, and the Copyright Act 1968. The ABC sought summary dismissal of the proceedings, arguing the Applicant had no reasonable prospect of success. The Applicant is representing himself.
the Applicant v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd
the Applicant, a casual trolley collector for Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd, was terminated on February 9, 2024. He alleges his termination and prior treatment were unlawful under various discrimination and workplace laws, stemming from an incident where he became unwell at work and a subsequent verbal altercation with a co-worker, Zachary Cooper, who allegedly made racist remarks. the Applicant claims Cooper photographed him while unwell and reported it to management. Coles is seeking summary judgment against the Applicant’s claims.
Application by Azura Fresh Nsw Pty Ltd Trading AS Azura Fresh
Azura Fresh NSW Pty Ltd, trading as Azura Fresh, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Azura Fresh Enterprise Agreement 2025–2029. The application was assigned case number AG2026/46 and was considered by a Deputy President. The company operates in the food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry. The agreement is categorised as a single-enterprise agreement covering a bridging period, with a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2029.
the Applicant v Telus Health (Australia) Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought a claim against Telus Health (Australia) Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered an application to deal with contraventions involving her dismissal. the Deputy President heard the case. The document itself is incomplete and lacks specific details about the events leading to the dismissal.
FWO v the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against the Respondent. The case involved non-payment for time worked and entitlements upon termination of employment. The decision was made on May 26, 2026.
FWO v the Respondent as the Trustee for Stylush Trust t/as Stylush AU
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against the Respondent. The matter involved non-compliance with a compliance notice.
the Applicant v Border Inn Bacchas Marsh Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The case involved Border Inn Bacchas Marsh Pty Ltd. The Commission noted the application was incomplete and related to a dismissal under section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act. Deputy President O'Neill and the Commissioner were involved in the decision.
the Applicant v Somerville Retail Services Pty Ltd
the Applicant sought an extension of time to file an application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act. Somerville Retail Services Pty Ltd was the respondent. The application was delayed by 680 days.
the Applicant v Dsv Australia Pty Ltd
The Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Dsv Australia Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission, comprised of Deputy President O’Neill, heard the case. The decision number is U2026/3120. The document indicates this is a decision regarding an unfair dismissal application.
the Applicant v Gasmak Pty Limited
the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Gasmak Pty Limited. The Fair Work Commission has not provided details regarding the events leading to the dismissal. The decision was made by Deputy President O’Neill.
Application by Lph Painting Co Pty Ltd
LPH Painting Co Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its proposed single-enterprise agreement, the LPH Painting Company Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2026. The application (AG2026/467) was heard by the Commissioner. The Commission considered whether the agreement passed the Better Off Overall Test (BOOT), whether all reasonable steps were taken to explain the agreement to employees, and whether employees genuinely agreed to it. Undertakings were provided as part of the process.
Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union re Hilton Foods Australia —Heathwood,Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union re Hilton Foods Australia —Heathwood
The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union applied for a regulated labour hire arrangement order concerning AWX Labour Hire Pty Ltd and Hilton Foods Australia Pty Ltd. The application relates to work performed at Hilton Foods Australia’s Heathwood, Queensland site. The Fair Work Commission was asked to consider the arrangement.
the Applicant v Eventful Supports Pty Ltd
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission seeking an unfair dismissal remedy from Eventful Supports Pty Ltd. She filed her application four days beyond the standard time limit. The Fair Work Commission did not grant an extension of time for the application.
the Applicant v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd
the Applicant worked as an Uber driver engaged by Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd. On 21 September 2025, he was deactivated from the Uber digital labour platform. He applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair deactivation remedy under the Fair Work Act 2009. The original decision, issued by Deputy President Dean on 23 February 2026, found he had not been unfairly deactivated. the Respondent's case was that the deactivation followed four complaints about the Applicant's conduct. the Deputy President found the Respondent had followed the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code, issuing warnings, preliminary notices and considering the Applicant's responses before making a final decision. the Applicant, representing himself, appealed that decision to a Full Bench of the Commission, also seeking to introduce additional business records as new evidence on appeal.
Application by Lph Painting Co Pty Ltd
LPH Painting Co Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of an enterprise agreement covering its employees. The agreement, titled the LPH Painting Company Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2026, was lodged under case number AG2026/467. The company operates in the building, metal and civil construction industries. The application was assessed by a Commissioner.
Application by Interstate Enterprises Pty Ltd Trading AS Tecside
Interstate Enterprises Pty Ltd, trading as Tecside, sought approval of a new enterprise agreement, the Tecside Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries. the Deputy President considered the application and related documents.
Application by Early Learning Association Australia Inc. Trading AS Early Learning Association Australia (ELAA)
Early Learning Association Australia Inc. (ELAA) applied to extend a single interest employer authorisation. The application relates to case B2024/235. The Fair Work Commission was considering this application. The Commissioner made the decision.
the Applicant v Cirrus AG Pty Ltd
the Applicant sought an unfair dismissal remedy from Cirrus AG Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered an application for an extension of time regarding this remedy. The details of the circumstances leading to the dismissal are not provided in the text.
Mining and Energy Union (301V) v Fitzroy Coal Management Pty Ltd
The Mining and Energy Union (MEU) brought a claim against Fitzroy Coal Management Pty Ltd. The dispute relates to matters arising under the Fitzroy Mining Operations Enterprise Agreement 2025 and the National Employment Standards (NES). The case number is C2026/3535. The enterprise agreement expires on December 4, 2028.
the Applicant v CorePlus Brighton Pty Ltd & the Respondent
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The application related to contraventions involving her dismissal. The Fair Work Commission case number was C2025/12576. CorePlus Brighton Pty Ltd and the Respondent were also involved. The Deputy President and another Deputy President heard the case.
the Applicant v Leap Support Services Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning her unfair dismissal from Leap Support Services Pty Ltd. The specifics of the dismissal and the reasons behind it are not detailed in the provided text. Deputy President O’Neill and the Commissioner heard the case.
Application by Specialty Packaging Group Pty Ltd Trading AS Opal Specialty Packaging
Specialty Packaging Group Pty Ltd, trading as Opal Specialty Packaging, applied for approval of the Specialty Packaging (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the graphic arts industry. the Commissioner heard the application. The agreement expires on April 21, 2029.
Application by Victorian Rail Track Trading AS VicTrack
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the approval of the VicTrack Enterprise Agreement 2025 – 2029. VicTrack, a rail industry organisation, sought approval for the agreement. The Commissioner heard the application.
the Applicant v The Trustee for Jacuzzi Hoppers Crossing Unit Trust
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission seeking a remedy for unfair dismissal. The Trustee for Jacuzzi Hoppers Crossing Unit Trust was the respondent. The decision was made by Deputy President O’Neill.
Application by Terra Verde DC Workforce Pty Ltd
Terra Verde DC Workforce Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a greenfields enterprise agreement called the Terra Verde DC Workforce Pty Limited (Tunnelling) Greenfields Agreement 2026. The application was assigned case number AG2026/764 and was decided by Deputy President Clancy. A greenfields agreement is a type of enterprise agreement made before any employees are hired to work under it, typically for a new project or enterprise. The agreement relates to the building, metal and civil construction industries, specifically tunnelling work.
the Applicant v Priceline Knox
the Applicant commenced employment with Priceline Knox. The matter concerns a dispute related to a contract of employment and entitlements under the National Employment Standards (NES) or a safety net contractual entitlement. The Fair Work Commission was asked to determine if a dispute existed.
Variation on the Commission’s own initiative – gender undervaluation – priority awards review,Variation on the Commission’s own initiative – gender undervaluation – priority awards review
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) is undertaking a review of gender undervaluation in certain modern awards. This decision, [2026] FWCFB 126, relates to a variation initiated by the Commission itself. The review covers the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020. The Commission has issued Phase 2 determinations as part of this review. Justice Hatcher was involved in the decision.
the Applicant v Best & Less Pty Limited
the Applicant commenced employment with Best & Less Pty Limited. The Fair Work Commission considered an application to deal with contraventions involving her dismissal. Deputy President Beaumont heard the case. The document indicates the case number was C2026/4322.
Application by Brolec (Qld) Pty Ltd
Brolec (Qld) Pty Ltd, an electrical contracting business, applied for approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement is between the company and the CEPU Electrical Division Queensland. The agreement covers the period from 2023 to 2026. Deputy President Colman heard the application.
Application by "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) (188V)
The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission regarding a proposed protected action ballot for employees of Acciona M&E Pty Ltd. The application concerned the building, metal and civil construction industries. Deputy President Colman heard the application.
Application by Ventora Group Pty Limited Trading AS Ventora
Ventora Group Pty Limited, trading as Ventora, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries. the Commissioner considered the application.
Application by Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application relates to the Commission’s power to make road transport minimum standards orders, employee-like worker minimum standards orders, and road transport contractual chain orders. The case references previous applications (MS2024/1, MS2024/2, MS2024/3, MS2024/4) and cites other Fair Work Commission decisions ([2024] FWC 2438). the Commissioner heard the application.
the Applicant v K J B Building Services Pty Ltd
the Applicant commenced an application to the Fair Work Commission seeking a remedy for unfair dismissal. He worked for K J B Building Services Pty Ltd. The application was filed out of time.
the Applicant v The Marlow Family Trust No3
the Applicant worked as a casual chef at several Sydney hotels operated by the Marlow Family Trust No 3. He applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy after being removed from the staff roster. Deputy President Cross dismissed his application on 27 March 2026, finding that the Applicant had not been dismissed. The Deputy President accepted that the Applicant was engaged on a regular and systematic basis, with rosters provided three weeks in advance, but found no contractual obligation on the employer to provide ongoing shifts. The removal from the roster was therefore not treated as dismissal, and later offers of occasional casual shifts meant the Applicant remained employed. Without a dismissal, the Commission had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. the Applicant appealed to the Full Bench under section 604 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Application/Notification by Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (139V)
The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for consent to alter eligibility rules. This application related to s 158 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. An objection was raised, and the Commission had to resolve this objection. the Vice President was involved.
Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the MNJ Engineering Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027. The union applied for approval of the agreement. The agreement covers employees in the plumbing industry. Deputy President Coleman heard the application.
Application by Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (006N)
The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) applied to the Fair Work Commission regarding a regulated labour hire arrangement order. This application concerned Drake Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Drake International, and its relationship with Aldi Foods Pty Ltd. The application relates to work performed for Aldi Foods Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission was considering the matter under LH2025/55.
Application by Beach Energy Limited
Beach Energy Limited applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Beach Energy Otway Operations (Maintenance Technicians) Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees in the oil and gas industry. The agreement's expiry date is August 1, 2028.
the Applicant v Karimbla Constructions Services (NSW) Pty Ltd
the Applicant was dismissed by Karimbla Constructions Services (NSW) Pty Ltd on 11 August 2025. She promptly filed an unfair dismissal application the following day. That application was dismissed on 7 November 2025 due to alleged non-compliance with procedural directions. the Applicant then discontinued her unfair dismissal application and, on 21 November 2025, filed a general protections application under s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This was 80 days outside the 21-day statutory deadline. Deputy President Cross refused her request for an extension of time, finding no exceptional circumstances existed. the Applicant appealed that refusal to the Full Bench, also seeking to introduce new documents not before the original decision-maker. The Full Bench heard the appeal on 20 May 2026.
Application by Cranbourne Pakenham Racing Club Inc
Cranbourne Pakenham Racing Club Inc applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a single-enterprise agreement called the Southside Racing Pakenham Racecourse Agreement 2026–2028. The application was assigned case number AG2026/1062 and came before the Commissioner. The club operates in the racing industry and holds ABN 71575147211. The agreement was described as a bridging-period agreement.
the Applicant v Uber Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Trading AS Uber Australia
the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Uber Australia Holdings Pty Ltd, trading as Uber Australia. The Fair Work Commission was asked to consider the circumstances of her dismissal. Deputy President O’Neill and Commissioner heard the case.
Application by Heidelberg Materials Australia Pty Ltd
Heidelberg Materials Australia Pty Ltd, a company in the cement and concrete products industry, sought approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement covers tipper drivers in the Eastern Region, specifically the Central Coast and Newcastle areas. The agreement's expiry date is September 30, 2029. the Commissioner heard the application.
Application by the Applicant
The Applicant lodged an application on 7 March 2026 seeking an unfair deactivation remedy against Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd trading as Uber. The application was made under the gig worker deactivation provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. After the application was filed, the Commissioner issued directions requiring the Applicant to file submissions, witness statements and supporting documents by 4 pm on 8 May 2026. The Applicant did not file any material, did not seek an extension, and did not attend a Case Management Conference on 24 April 2026. The Commission sent follow-up correspondence and extended the deadline to 9 am on 12 May 2026. The Applicant again failed to comply. A non-compliance hearing was scheduled for 18 May 2026. The Applicant did not attend that hearing either, despite phone calls and emails from the Commissioner. Uber's solicitors appeared and applied for the matter to be dismissed. The Applicant was given a further opportunity to respond by 20 May 2026 but provided no reply.
the Applicant v Monkey Magic Bar Pty Ltd
the Applicant, an employee, brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning their dismissal from Monkey Magic Bar Pty Ltd. The Commission's decision, delivered on May 28, 2026, was made by Deputy President O’Neill.
Application by CFMEU (105N)
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding an enterprise agreement. The agreement is between Lagana Family Trust, trading as Universal Pumping Pty Ltd, and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Concrete Pumping Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027. The agreement covers employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries. Deputy President Bell heard the application.
the Applicant v Revolutions Gym Pty. Ltd.
the Applicant commenced employment with Revolutions Gym Pty. Ltd. The matter concerns an application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal. the Commissioner heard the application. The document indicates this is a decision [2026] FWC 1968.
Application by the Applicant
The Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned a dismissal and related to previous applications concerning the same dismissal. Somerville Retail Services Pty Ltd was the respondent. Deputy President Farouque heard the case.
the Applicant v Green Drake Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Grey Unit Trust Trading AS Grey Farming
the Applicant commenced employment with Green Drake Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Grey Unit Trust Trading AS Grey Farming. The matter concerned whether the Applicant was dismissed. the Commissioner heard the application.
Application by Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited Trading AS Inghams Enterprises
Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited, trading as Inghams Enterprises, sought approval of the Inghams Enterprises (South Australia Processing and Distribution) Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the poultry processing industry in South Australia. the Commissioner considered the application and related documents. The agreement is approved and will expire on May 31, 2029.
the Applicant v Murray Zircon Pty Ltd
the Applicant commenced employment with Murray Zircon Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission heard an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. the Commissioner presided over the case. The document indicates this is a decision from the Fair Work Commission, dated May 28, 2026.
the Applicant v ALDI Foods Pty Ltd as General Partner of ALDI Stores (A Limited Partnership)
the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against ALDI Foods Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered whether ALDI had a valid reason for dismissing the Applicant and whether the dismissal was harsh. The case number was U2025/17245.
Application by CFMEU (105N)
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the proposed V LAND PLASTERING GROUP PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Plastering Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027. The agreement covers employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries. Deputy President Bell heard the application.
Aldi Foods Pty Limited As General Partner Of Aldi Stores (A Limited Partnership) Trading AS Aldi Stores v Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (006N) & United Workers' Union (108V) and Others
Aldi Foods Pty Limited appealed decisions made by a Fair Work Commissioner regarding multiple matters (AG2024/4407, AG2025/972, and AG2025/111). The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association and the United Workers' Union were involved. The appeal concerned decisions made on 2 January 2026, following earlier decisions made on 20 October 2025. The case involved a number of applications and appeals related to Aldi Stores.
Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU/ETU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a new enterprise agreement covering electrical contracting work. The agreement, titled the Ace Electrics Pty Ltd and ETU Electrical Contracting Enterprise Agreement 2025–2029, was lodged under case number AG2026/1034. The matter came before Deputy President Colman for approval. The agreement is classified as a single-enterprise agreement made during the bridging period, with an expiry date of 31 March 2029.
Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (the Union) applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned a case, B2026/252. The Union sought to extend a 30-day period related to this earlier case. Deputy President Hampton heard the application.
Application by JBS Australia Pty Limited Trading AS D.R. Johnston Group
JBS Australia Pty Limited, trading as D.R. Johnston Group, applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned a variation to redundancy pay. Commissioner Sloan heard the application. The industry is the meat industry.
the Applicant v Westpac Banking Corporation
the Applicant appealed interlocutory decisions and a decision made by the Commissioner in February 2026. The original case involved the Applicant and Westpac Banking Corporation. The appeal concerned transcript issues and the earlier decision in matter U2024/5849. The Fair Work Commission Full Bench heard the appeal.
Application by CFMEU (105N)
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the Dominion Global Pty Ltd and CFMEU Agreement 2024. Deputy President Bell heard the application. The agreement relates to the building, metal and civil construction industries. The agreement was set to expire on December 31, 2027.
Application by Armest Pty Ltd Trading AS Miles Witt Partnership
Armest Pty Ltd, trading as Miles Witt Partnership, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Seventh-day Adventist Conference Campsites Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees working at campsites run by the Seventh-day Adventist Conference. The Deputy President Wright considered the application.
Application by Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) lodged four applications with the Fair Work Commission (MS2024/1 to MS2024/4) seeking minimum standards orders for employee-like workers and road transport workers, and a road transport contractual chain order. An Expert Panel consisting of Vice President Asbury and three Commissioners is managing these proceedings. In February 2025, the Panel issued a statement proposing four research projects to gather data on digital platform workers and road transport supply chains, and invited interested parties to comment. Submissions were received from academic Dr Lutfun Nahar Lata, delivery platform DoorDash, and the TWU. The Panel then issued this statement deciding which research projects would proceed to inform consultation and any subsequent proceedings.
Application by the Applicant
The Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned an unfair deactivation remedy. Deputy President O'Keeffe heard the application. The document indicates this is a decision, dated May 28, 2026, with a document number of UDE2026/34 and citation [2026] FWC 1956.
Application by Boral Resources (Wa) Ltd
Boral Resources (WA) Ltd applied under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to approve the Boral Concrete (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2026, a single-enterprise agreement covering workers in the cement and concrete products industry in Western Australia. The Transport Workers Union of Australia and the Australian Workers' Union were bargaining representatives and sought coverage under the agreement. the Commissioner considered the application in Perth, noting one clause that appeared potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards. Specifically, clause 8.1.2 allowed Boral to withhold money owed to an employee on termination if the employee failed to give adequate notice, without limiting what types of money could be withheld.
Application by Timber Furnishing and Textiles Union (302V) for an Entry Permit for Han Thi Ngoc Le
The Applicant applied for an entry permit to enter a workplace. The Fair Work Commission considered the application, which related to a variation to right of entry permits following a withdrawal from an amalgamated organisation. The decision addresses issues including the registered name of the organisation and a correction of an earlier decision.
Application by Harvey Fresh Trading AS Harvey Fresh (1994) Ltd
Harvey Fresh Trading (trading as Harvey Fresh (1994) Ltd) applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Lactalis Australia – Harvey Fresh Enterprise Agreement 2026. The application was assigned case number AG2026/842 and came before the Commissioner. The employer operates in the manufacturing and associated industries sector. The agreement is classified as a single-enterprise agreement covering a bridging period.
the Applicant v Uniting NSW, ACT
the Applicant appealed a decision made by Deputy President Dean in matter number U2025/20143. The case involved Uniting NSW, ACT. Deputy President Slevin heard the appeal. The decision relates to a document published on May 28, 2026.
the Applicant v IDK Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought an appeal against a Fair Work Commission decision made by the Commissioner. The original decision concerned a matter number U2025/13472. The appeal was heard by Deputy President Slevin. The case involved IDK Pty Ltd, a company whose industry is not specified in the provided text. The original decision is referenced as [2026] FWC 555.
the Applicant v Asuria People Services Pty Limited
the Applicant, also known as Kenny Ha, appealed a Fair Work Commission decision. The original decision was made by Deputy President Cross on 17 April 2026, in matter number C2025/9708. The appeal was heard by Deputy President Slevin. The case concerns a dispute related to a previous Fair Work Commission decision.
Application by Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application relates to minimum standards orders and road transport contractual chain orders under Chapter 3A of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application also concerns a recent increase in fuel prices and proposes a conference to discuss the matter. The case is identified as MS2024/1.
the Applicant v Bbq King Melbourne Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Bbq King Melbourne Pty Ltd. The Deputy President Masson dismissed the application under section 399A of the Fair Work Act 2009. The document indicates this was a decision published by the Fair Work Commission.
the Applicant v SME Investments (WA) Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against SME Investments (WA) Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission has not provided details about the events leading to the dismissal or the nature of the Applicant’s role. The decision was published on May 28, 2026.
Application by Fremantle Freight & Storage Pty Ltd
Fremantle Freight & Storage Pty Ltd applied for approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2026. the Commissioner considered the application. The agreement relates to employees in the storage services industry.
Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia & Australian Road Transport Industrial Organization re fuel cost recovery
The Transport Workers' Union of Australia and the Australian Road Transport Industrial Organization applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned a road transport contractual chain order relating to fuel cost recovery. The Commission was considering the order. Vice President Asbury was involved.
United Workers' Union (108V) v Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd
The United Workers' Union (UWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission under s.739 of the Fair Work Act 2009 on behalf of its members, disputing how Clause 13 of the Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd National Logistics Support Centre Enterprise Agreement 2022 should apply to labour hire workers at Electrolux's Beverley, South Australia site. Electrolux used workers supplied by Trojan Recruitment Group Pty Ltd alongside its own direct employees. The UWU alleged that Trojan workers were paid only the base hourly rate under the agreement, without casual loading or other entitlements, between October 2022 and October 2025. After conciliation and discussions, Electrolux directed Trojan in October 2025 to pay workers the base rate plus a 25% casual loading. The UWU continued its application seeking formal determinations about what 'paid in accordance with this agreement' required across a range of pay conditions and duties.
Application by St John’s Grammar School Inc. Trading AS St John’s Grammar School
St John's Grammar School Inc., trading as St John's Grammar School, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a single-enterprise agreement covering its employees. The application, lodged under case number AG2026/1132, was decided by the Commissioner on 27 May 2026. The school operates in the educational services industry.
Application by Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) lodged four applications with the Fair Work Commission in August and September 2024. Three applications (MS2024/1, MS2024/2, MS2024/3) sought minimum standards orders covering employee-like workers and independent contractors doing 'last mile' delivery work and food delivery. A fourth application (MS2024/4) sought a road transport contractual chain order. The Commission's President constituted an Expert Panel for the road transport industry to facilitate consultation with affected parties. The Australian Industry Group submitted that consultation should wait until the Road Transport Advisory Group advised on prioritisation. The Expert Panel decided to convene a procedural conference on 29 November 2024 in Sydney to discuss how consultation would proceed across all four applications.
Application by AKD NSW Pty Ltd Trading AS AKD
AKD NSW Pty Ltd, trading as AKD, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a new single-enterprise agreement called the AKD Tumut Agreement 2026. The application was assigned case number AG2026/1121 and came before Deputy President Saunders. AKD operates in the timber and paper products industry. The agreement is described as a bridging-period agreement and is recorded with award identifier AE532985.
Application by Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) lodged four applications seeking minimum standards orders for employee-like workers and road transport workers, plus a road transport contractual chain order. Menulog Pty Ltd separately applied to create a modern award covering the on-demand delivery services industry. All five applications were referred to the Road Transport Advisory Group (RTAG), a specialist advisory body under the Fair Work Act 2009. President Hatcher directed the RTAG to advise on how the Commission should prioritise and process the applications. The RTAG provided its advice on 11 December 2024, slightly after the original deadline, and President Hatcher granted an extension of time. The decision published the RTAG's advice and invited interested parties to make submissions by 23 December 2024.
Application by CFMEU (105N)
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the proposed enterprise agreement between Newgen Glass & Aluminium Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) for subcontractors in cladding and facade work. The agreement covers the period from 2024 to 2027. Deputy President Masson heard the application.
Application by Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
In August 2024, the Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) lodged three applications with the Fair Work Commission seeking minimum standards orders for gig-economy and road transport workers. Two applications (MS2024/1 and MS2024/3) sought employee-like worker minimum standards orders covering digital platform workers delivering packages and food or beverages respectively. The third application (MS2024/2) sought a road transport minimum standards order covering regulated road transport contractors in last-mile package delivery. The applications followed amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 that commenced on 26 August 2024, giving the Commission new powers to set minimum standards for these worker categories. President Hatcher issued this statement setting out how the Commission intended to manage the applications, including which panels would hear them and how the Road Transport Advisory Group would be consulted.
Application by Indigo Shire Council
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the Indigo Shire Council Enterprise Agreement 2025 – 2028. The agreement was submitted for approval. the Commissioner heard the application. The agreement covers employees in the local government administration industry.
Application by Levent Painting Pty Ltd
Levent Painting Pty Ltd applied for approval of an enterprise agreement. The Fair Work Commission was considering the application. Deputy President O'Keeffe was involved in the decision. The enterprise agreement covers employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries.
Application by Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd Trading AS VCV Australia
Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd, trading as VCV Australia, applied for approval of a new enterprise agreement. The agreement, titled 'Volvo Group Australia Retail Enterprise Agreement (2026 - 2029)', covers employees in the vehicle industry. the Commissioner considered the application. The agreement's expiry date is April 30, 2029.
Application by Eletech Pty Ltd
Eletech Pty Ltd, an electrical contracting business, applied for approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2026–2028. The Fair Work Commission considered the application. the Commissioner made the decision. The agreement covers employees in the electrical contracting industry.
the Applicant v The Respondent
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission. The application sought an extension of time. Deputy President Clancy heard the application.
Application by Stanmore Trading AS Stanmore Smc Pty Ltd
The Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Stanmore Poitrel Mine Enterprise Agreement 2026. The application was assigned case number AG2026/1083 and was considered by the Commissioner. The employer operates in the mining industry.
Application by CB Admin Pty Ltd
CB Admin Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Cleary Bros Quarry Employees Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was assigned case number AG2026/1131 and came before Commissioner Walkaden. The agreement is described as a single-enterprise agreement covering the quarrying industry, with an ABN of 50683083990 and an expiry date of 1 November 2029.
Application by CFMEU - Construction and General Division, South Australia Divisional Branch (105N-SA1) for an Entry Permit for the Applicant
The CFMEU, Construction and General Division, South Australia Divisional Branch, applied for an entry permit for the Applicant under section 512 of the Fair Work Act. The application related to a construction site. The Deputy President issued a decision regarding the permit.
the Applicant v The Trustee For The MTM Trust
the Applicant sought an extension of time to file an unfair dismissal application. The Trustee For The MTM Trust was the respondent. the Commissioner heard the application. The decision relates to an application for an extension of time.
the Applicant v Grimshaw Architects Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The details of the dismissal and the specific contraventions are not detailed in the provided text. the Commissioner heard the case. The case number is C2025/9418.
the Applicant v Peninsula Health
the Applicant, an employee of Peninsula Health, brought an application to the Fair Work Commission regarding an unfair dismissal. The details of the dismissal and the reasons behind it are not provided in the available text. the Commissioner heard the application.
Application by Coca Cola Europacific Partners Pty Ltd
Coca Cola Europacific Partners Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its Victorian Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the food, beverages, and tobacco manufacturing industry. the Commissioner considered the application. The agreement expires on May 31, 2029.
Application by CFMEU (105N)
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement is between Steelfinne Fabrications Unit Trust t/as Steelfinne Fabrications Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Architectural Features & Fittings Enterprise Agreement 2024–2027. The agreement covers employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries. Deputy President Masson heard the application.
Application by Qube Forestry Pty Ltd Trading AS Qube Forestry
Qube Forestry Pty Ltd, trading as Qube Forestry, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its Tasmania Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees in the timber and paper products industry. the Commissioner heard the application. The agreement expires on December 31, 2028.
Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (the Union) applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned a case, B2026/338. The Union sought to extend a 30-day period related to this case. Deputy President Wright heard the application.
Application by Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd Trading AS Sunbeam Foods
Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd, trading as Sunbeam Foods, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its Metal & Electrical Trades Employees Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees in the food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry. the Commissioner heard the application. The agreement expires on April 1, 2027.
the Applicant v BG&E Pty Limited
the Applicant commenced employment with BG&E Pty Limited. The Fair Work Commission heard an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. the Deputy President presided over the case. The decision references the Variation of Professional Employees Award 2020 and Don Peteranna v Adco Construction (Vic) Pty Ltd.
the Applicant v Myer Pty Ltd
the Applicant sought to file an application with the Fair Work Commission. The application was lodged eight days beyond the time limit. Myer Pty Ltd did not oppose the application but requested that the time limit be extended. Deputy President Clancy considered the request.
Application by CFMEU (105N)
The CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 185 of the Fair Work Act for approval of a single-enterprise agreement covering FTW Crane Hire Pty Ltd. The agreement, titled the FTW Crane Hire Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Mobile Crane Hiring Industry Enterprise Agreement 2024–2027, was lodged as case AG2026/1093. The matter came before Deputy President Bell for approval.
Application by United Workers' Union (108V)
The United Workers' Union applied to the Fair Work Commission regarding a proposed protected action ballot for employees of Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd. The ballot relates to a dispute concerning workplace matters. Deputy President Hampton and another Commissioner heard the application. The case number is B2026/574.
Application by William Angliss Institute of TAFE Trading AS William Angliss Institute
William Angliss Institute of TAFE applied under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for approval of a single enterprise agreement covering its academic employees. The application was made to the Fair Work Commission and assigned reference AG2026/1076. The National Tertiary Education Industry Union (NTEU) also lodged a statutory declaration under section 183 indicating it wished to be covered by the agreement.
Application by Cubis Systems Pty Ltd
Cubis Systems Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its Narangba Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees in the manufacturing and associated industries. the Commissioner considered the application. The agreement expires on June 30, 2028.
the Applicant v Community Solutions Group Ltd
the Applicant commenced employment with Community Solutions Group Ltd. The Fair Work Commission was asked to deal with contraventions involving her dismissal. Deputy President O’Keeffe heard the case. The decision references previous cases including *Miller, Gail v DPV Health Ltd* and *Mr Cody Harwood v Scotch Oakburn College Inc.*
Application by Monadelphous Electrical & Instrumentation Pty Ltd
Monadelphous Electrical & Instrumentation Pty Ltd applied for approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the electrical contracting industry. the Deputy President made the decision.
Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Fire Service Specialists Pty Ltd and ETU Electrical Contracting Enterprise Agreement 2025–2029. The application was assigned case number AG2026/1057 and was heard by Deputy President Colman. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement covering the electrical contracting industry.
Application by Ngurratjuta/Pmara Ntjarra Aboriginal Corporation
The Fair Work Commission considered an application regarding the approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement is for the Ngurratjuta/Pmara Ntjarra Aboriginal Corporation. The agreement covers the period from 2026 to 2030. The industry is social, community, home care and disability services.
Application by the Applicant
the Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair deactivation remedy. The specifics of the application are not detailed in the provided text. The Commission notes several related cases were considered in reaching its decision.
Application by Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd Trading AS Sorbent Paper
Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd, trading as Sorbent Paper, sought approval of a new enterprise agreement with the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union (TWU). The agreement covers the period from 2025 to 2028. The Fair Work Commission considered the application for approval. The agreement applies to employees in the timber and paper products industry.
Application by SRG Global Civil Pty Ltd
SRG Global Civil Pty Ltd applied for approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2026. The Fair Work Commission considered the application. the Commissioner made the decision. The agreement covers employees in the building services industry. The agreement’s expiry date is 2030.
the Applicant v Tunnelling Solutions Pty Ltd & the Respondent and Another
the Applicant brought a case against Tunnelling Solutions Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant was dismissed. The case number was C2026/1366.
the Applicant v Australian Livestock Farms Pty Ltd and others
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission. The case concerned an application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act. The Fair Work Commission found there was no dismissal in this case.
the Applicant v Engaged Support Services & Ess Behaviour Specialists
the Applicant brought a claim against Engaged Support Services and Ess Behaviour Specialists. The Fair Work Commission was asked to deal with contraventions involving her dismissal. the Commissioner heard the case. No further details about the events leading to the claim are available in the provided text.
the Applicant v Burswood Nominees Ltd
the Applicant worked for Burswood Nominees Ltd. The Fair Work Commission heard an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The decision references a previous case, Alan Geoffrey Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd. The Deputy President heard the case.
Application by Cardtronics Australasia Pty Ltd Trading AS Ncr Atleos
Cardtronics Australasia Pty Ltd, trading as NCR Atleos, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the NCR Atleos Australia Field Service Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the business equipment industry. the Commissioner heard the application. The agreement expires on 2029-05-26.
Application by Alliance Airlines Pty Limited
Alliance Airlines Pty Limited applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application concerned a variation of redundancy pay. the Commissioner heard the application. The case number was C2026/2742.
CFMEU - Construction and General Division, Queensland Northern Territory Divisional Branch (105N-QLD) v C&H Acquisition Pty Ltd
The CFMEU - Construction and General Division, Queensland Northern Territory Divisional Branch, brought an application to the Fair Work Commission regarding a dismissal. The case involved C&H Acquisition Pty Ltd. The Deputy President Wright heard the application.
Application by Club Macquarie Limited Trading AS Club Macquarie Ltd
Club Macquarie Limited, trading as Club Macquarie Ltd, applied for approval of its employees’ enterprise agreement. The agreement covers employees in the hospitality industry. the Commissioner considered the application. The enterprise agreement expires on 26 May 2030.
Application by Programmed Facility Management Pty Ltd
Programmed Facility Management Pty Ltd applied for approval of its Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2025. The Fair Work Commission considered the application. the Commissioner heard the application. The agreement covers employees in manufacturing and associated industries.
Application by Phe Hv And Switchboards Pty Ltd
Phe HV and Switchboards Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement covers employees in the electrical contracting industry. the Commissioner heard the application.
the Applicant v The General Gumala Foundation Trust
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning contraventions involving her dismissal. The General Gumala Foundation Trust was the respondent. The Commission considered a jurisdictional objection raised by the respondent.
Application by Legeneering Services Pty Ltd Trading AS Legeneering
Legeneering Services Pty Ltd, trading as Legeneering, sought approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement covers employees in the oil and gas industry. the Commissioner considered the application. The agreement expires in 2030.
Application by West Australian Ballet Company Trading AS West Australian Ballet
The West Australian Ballet Company Trading As West Australian Ballet applied for approval of the West Australian Ballet Dancers’ Enterprise Agreement 2026 – 2027. The Commissioner considered the application. The agreement covers the live performance industry. It is approved and will expire on December 31, 2027.
Application by Gordon Brothers Industries Pty Ltd
Gordon Brothers Industries Pty Ltd applied for approval of its Metal Trades Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement covers employees in the manufacturing and associated industries. The Fair Work Commission was considering the application. The agreement expires on June 30, 2028.
the Applicant v Qantas Airways Limited
the Applicant brought a claim against Qantas Airways Limited. The dispute concerned his classification and rate of pay. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the matter arose under an enterprise agreement. The relevant enterprise agreements had ceased to operate.
Sydney Trains v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)
Sydney Trains and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia were involved in a dispute. The dispute concerned matters arising under the Sydney Trains and NSW Trainlink Enterprise Agreement 2025 and the National Employment Standards (NES).
Application by Estia Investments Pty Limited Trading AS Estia Health
Estia Investments Pty Limited, trading as Estia Health, applied to the Fair Work Commission. The application relates to instruments covering a new employer and transferring employees. the Commissioner heard the application. The case reference is AG2026/926.
Application by Meercroft Care Inc
Meercroft Care Inc, a health and welfare services provider, sought approval of its Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2026. The agreement was submitted for consideration. the Deputy President was involved in the decision. The agreement covers a bridging period until 2028-08-01.
Application by Honeywell Limited
Honeywell Limited applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a new enterprise agreement. The agreement covers technicians in Victoria and is with the HBS Technicians Victoria and ETU. The proposed agreement would run from 2025 to 2029. The Commissioner was considering the application for approval.
FWO v Serotonin Eatery Exercise Education Pty Ltd
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Serotonin Eatery Exercise Education Pty Ltd. The proceedings related to non-compliance with a compliance notice. Details of the specific breaches are not provided in the source text.
FWO v the Respondent t/as The Pantry at Corrimal
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against the Applicant. This action concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice. Details of the specific breaches are not provided in this document.
FWO v the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against the Applicant and the Second Respondent. The proceedings involved allegations of providing false documents, underpayments, failing to provide payslips, and record-keeping contraventions. The case was heard on 8 May 2026.
Ambulance Employees Association of Western Australia Incorporated v United Workers’ Union
The Ambulance Employees Association of Western Australia (AEAWA) applied to be registered as an organisation under the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The United Workers' Union (UWU) applied to have that registration application summarily dismissed. A Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission dismissed the AEAWA's application, and the Commission's Full Bench upheld that decision. The Commission treated the AEAWA as an 'enterprise association' because a majority of its members were employed in a single enterprise, and concluded it was therefore ineligible to register as an employee association. The AEAWA sought judicial review in the Federal Court, arguing the Commission had misread the legislation. The Victorian Ambulance Union intervened in support of the AEAWA.
Western Chinese Language School Incorporated v Fair Work Ombudsman
Western Chinese Language School Incorporated (WCLS), a community language school, received a compliance notice in September 2022 from a Fair Work Inspector. The notice alleged WCLS had breached the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 (SCHADS Award), specifically by underpaying penalty rates for Saturday and public holiday work. WCLS was required to calculate and rectify those underpayments by November 2022. WCLS did not comply. The Fair Work Ombudsman then commenced proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court against WCLS and its then-Chairperson, Baoquan Chen. The primary court found both liable and imposed penalties. WCLS appealed to the Full Federal Court on six grounds, including that the SCHADS Award did not cover community language schools, that the compliance notice was legally deficient, and that the primary judge wrongly refused WCLS leave to amend its defence.
FWO v Metisse Bar and Restaurant Group Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against Metisse Bar and Restaurant Group Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The proceedings related to non-compliance with two compliance notices. Details regarding the specific nature of the non-compliance are not provided in the source text.
the Applicant v Posh N Polished Pty Ltd
Lida Peymani was employed by Posh N Polished Pty Ltd as a salon manager and cosmetic tattooist from September 2024, on a salary of $81,000 plus commission. In May 2025, she sent her employer a written proposal requesting either a pay increase or a mutual separation. She alleges the director responded with verbal pressure and imposed commission reductions. A dispute followed, during which she says she was demoted, locked out of company systems, and ultimately asked not to return. She regards this as constructive dismissal. She initially filed with the Fair Work Commission, then brought a general protections court application in the Federal Court. Because she filed that court application outside the 14-day statutory time limit, she needed the court's permission to proceed. She appeared without a lawyer.
the Applicant v McDonald’s Australia Ltd
A class action was filed in the Federal Court of Australia in 2023 on behalf of current and former managers at corporate-owned and franchisee-owned McDonald's restaurants. The claim covers the period 6 December 2017 to 3 February 2020. The core allegation is that these managers were not paid for work performed before their rostered start time or after their rostered finish time. McDonald's Australia Ltd and one franchisee, Pollburg Pty Ltd, have actively defended the case. The court held a hearing on 24 April 2026 to determine the scope of an initial trial, including which group members' claims should be tested and whether the question of 'serious contravention' under the Fair Work Act 2009 should be resolved at that trial.
FWO v the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against the Applicant. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice and failure to provide payslips. This occurred on 1 May 2026.
the Applicant v Chandler Macleod Group Limited (Costs)
the Applicant, who represented himself (a litigant in person), brought proceedings against Chandler Macleod Group Limited under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). After the substantive matter was resolved, Chandler Macleod applied to the Federal Court of Australia for a costs order against the Applicant. The court considered two questions: whether the Applicant had started the proceedings without reasonable cause, and whether any unreasonable act or omission by the Applicant caused Chandler Macleod to incur legal costs. The court also considered what weight, if any, should be given to the fact that the Applicant was self-represented.
the Applicant v City of Hobart
Paulsen brought a general protections court application against the City of Hobart under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The application was not filed within the statutory time limit set by the Act. Paulsen applied for an extension of time under section 370(a)(ii) of the Act. The case came before the Federal Court of Australia, which considered whether there was an adequate explanation for the delay in filing.
[2025] FWC 923
The Maritime Union of Australia (a division of the CFMEU) lodged a dispute against Sydney International Container Terminals Pty Ltd (trading as Hutchison Ports Sydney) and its Brisbane counterpart under their shared enterprise agreement. The dispute centred on whether shiftworkers who were rostered off on a public holiday, and did not work that day, were entitled to an extra day's pay at ordinary rates. The Stevedoring Industry Award 2020 expressly provides that benefit, but the enterprise agreement was silent on it. One employee, the Applicant, a maintenance worker at Port Botany working 32 ordinary hours per week on a 12-hour rotating roster, had never received that additional payment. The matter was arbitrated on the papers by Deputy President Easton.
Decision [2025] FWCFB 74
The Fair Work Commission's Expert Panel, constituted under s 620(1D) of the Fair Work Act 2009, conducted a self-initiated review into gender-based undervaluation of work across five modern awards. The review was triggered by findings in the Annual Wage Review 2023–24 identifying priority occupational groups in female-dominated industries whose minimum award wage rates had never been properly assessed on a gender-neutral basis. The awards examined were the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020, the Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2020, the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and Practitioners and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services Award 2020, and the Children's Services Award 2010. Separate union applications to vary the SCHADS Award were joined to the proceedings. Hearings were conducted in Sydney and Melbourne in December 2024.
[2026] FWCFB 44
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (MUA) appealed a Fair Work Commission decision concerning public holiday pay for shiftworkers at Sydney International Container Terminals Pty Limited (SICTL). The dispute arose when a union member, Ross Pettett, was not paid the ordinary rate for a public holiday while rostered off. The Deputy President had ruled that SICTL was not obligated to pay shiftworkers this rate. The core issue was whether a clause in the Stevedoring Industry Award 2020, regarding payment for shiftworkers rostered off on public holidays, was incorporated into the Hutchison Ports Australia and MUA Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[2026] FWCFB 33
Leigh Moiler was dismissed from his role as a production worker at Cowra Meat Processors Pty Limited (Cowra Meat) in March 2025. The dismissal followed his absence from work and alleged misconduct, including verbal abuse of a supervisor and leaving early without permission. Moiler initially applied for unfair dismissal and was initially found to be unfairly dismissed and ordered reinstatement by Commissioner Walkaden. Cowra Meat appealed this decision, seeking to challenge the reinstatement order.
[2026] FWC 515
Shane Stephens commenced an unfair dismissal claim against Citic Pacific Mining Management Pty Ltd in September 2025, seeking reinstatement. The case involved a drug test failure and concerns about the chain of custody of samples. A hearing was scheduled for February 18, 2026, but Stephens discontinued his claim approximately 37 minutes before the hearing, citing feeling overwhelmed and unprepared. Citic Pacific sought an order for costs due to Stephens’ conduct.
[2026] FWC 252
the Applicant, a Powerline Worker at Essential Energy’s Leeton Depot in New South Wales, was dismissed on 14 May 2025, following an incident at a toolbox meeting on 20 February 2025. The dismissal stemmed from aggressive and threatening behavior towards a colleague, the Second Respondent. the Applicant attributed his behavior to an anxiety attack, citing personal difficulties including his aunt entering palliative care and his father’s cancer diagnosis. Prior to the incident, there was a disagreement regarding a truck pickup, which was discussed in a group chat. Witnesses, including fellow workers and union representatives, provided evidence during the hearing.
[2026] FWCFB 27
This case involves a dispute between SC Hydro Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) regarding the correct classification of employees driving concrete agitator trucks on the Snowy Hydro 2.0 project. The dispute centres on whether these employees should be classified as Tunneller Class 2 (TW2) or Tunneller Class 1 (TW3) under the SC Hydro Pty Ltd – AWU Tunnel and Associated Works Greenfield Agreement 2021 – 2025. Previous decisions by the Fair Work Commission and Full Bench had determined the employees should be classified as TW3. SC Hydro failed to implement these decisions, prompting the CFMEU to seek further orders from the Commission.
[2026] FWC 347
Brayden Dale-McCormick was dismissed from Sleepeezee Bedding Australia Pty Ltd after a roadside drug test revealed cannabis in his system. Dale-McCormick admitted to using cannabis over the weekend prior to returning to work. The company administered a roadside test during working hours while he was driving a heavy combination truck. The dismissal occurred on May 13, 2025, and Dale-McCormick applied for unfair dismissal remedy on May 20, 2025. Sleepeezee Bedding stated they had 143 employees at the time, disqualifying them from being considered a small business employer. There was some inconsistency in the evidence regarding when Dale-McCormick admitted to cannabis use.
[2026] FWC 298
The Applicant was employed by Tru Ninja Pty Ltd as a part-time Supervisor and Administrator from June 2024 to October 2025. She was dismissed for serious misconduct related to her handling of bereavement leave following the death of her grandmother and subsequent communication with the employer. Her partner contacted the employer on her behalf, and the company felt the communication was aggressive. The Applicant sought compassionate leave and was repeatedly asked for documentation, which was difficult to provide immediately. The company alleged further misconduct including providing contact details to a third party and refusing to respond to communications. The Applicant was later dismissed and sought an unfair dismissal remedy.
[2026] FWC 390
the Applicant initiated a general protections application concerning his dismissal by the Respondent. The application was lodged four seconds outside the 21-day statutory timeframe. the Applicant argued the delay was due to system processing and that payment was made within the timeframe, referencing a tax invoice. The Commission clarified that the tax invoice used Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which is 10 hours behind Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST). the Applicant also received an acknowledgement email two minutes after midnight.
[2024] FWC 3196
The dispute involves employees driving concrete agitator trucks on the Snowy Hydro 2.0 project in New South Wales. SC Hydro Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) disagree about the correct classification of these employees under the SC Hydro Tunnel and Associated Works Greenfield Agreement 2021 – 2025. SC Hydro classifies them as Tunneller Class 2 (TW2), while the CFMEU argues they should be classified as Tunneller Class 1 (TW3). Several employees, including Raymond Orreal, Edward Riley, Glenn Willmott, Gavin Blyth, Steven Roach, Clyde Farr, Ian Starr, Christophe Biberian, Brett Rewald, and Louis Brell, are involved. The dispute concerns whether the employees are performing work that warrants the higher classification.
[2025] FWCFB 283
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) reviewed classifications in the Children’s Services Award 2010 (CS Award) to address potential gender-based undervaluation. In April 2025, the FWC found that Children’s Services Employees (CSEs) had been undervalued and proposed adjustments to their rates of pay. Following consultations with the Australian Childcare Alliance (ACA), the United Workers Union (UWU), the Australian Industry Group (Ai Group), Australian Business Industrial, the New South Wales Business Chamber Ltd, the Community Child Care Association and Community Early Learning Australia, a draft determination was developed. Discussions focused on the phasing-in of wage increases and the operative date.
[2026] FWC 434
Cassandra Cooke, a First Officer (pilot) with 27 years of service at National Jet Express Pty Ltd, was dismissed after allegedly making disparaging comments about a colleague, Wayne Ovens, to a work colleague, Victoria Portelli. Portelli reported the comments to Ovens, who filed a written complaint. The comments reportedly included claims about Ovens’ work and personal life. Cooke denied making the comments. An investigation substantiated the allegations, leading to her dismissal for 'serious misconduct' despite receiving payment in lieu of notice. Cooke initiated an unfair dismissal application under the Fair Work Act 2009.
[2025] FWC 2793
The Applicant was dismissed from Cowra Meat Processors Pty Limited in March 2025. The dismissal followed a period of unauthorised absence and alleged misconduct. The Applicant had been employed since April 2017 and was on annual leave before his absence. He was caring for his father, who was recovering from heart surgery, when he failed to return to work as scheduled. The company alleged he left a shift early and verbally abused a staff member. A formal meeting resulted in his termination, citing serious misconduct.
[2026] FWC 362
Serena and Emma Donato were employees of Queensland Venue Co Pty Ltd. Serena was a Food and Beverage Supervisor and Emma was a Duty Manager. In July 2025, Emma placed rubber ducks and a hand-drawn pentagram on a manager’s desk, which was reported as distressing. A formal complaint was made, and an investigation began. Serena was involved in an Instagram group chat where messages mocking the manager were posted. Both employees received Letters of Allegation and were subsequently dismissed. Serena questioned why she wasn't asked about her relationship with the manager during her disciplinary meeting.
[2026] FWC 512
Eric Jordan was dismissed from Pacific National Services Pty Ltd on 26 May 2025. The company alleges he performed Nazi salutes at Mittagong Railway Station on 6 March 2025, breaching workplace policies and damaging the company's reputation. Jordan denies the allegations, claiming he used an 'all clear' signal or a gesture of camaraderie. The company issued a final written warning to Jordan on 17 April 2025 for failing to follow a roster direction. CCTV footage and witness statements were presented as evidence. A workplace investigation was conducted, with a senior employee relations specialist initially handling it before being transferred to a manager based in Queensland.
[2026] FWC 326
Alyeesha Hall was dismissed from Matic Transport Pty Ltd on 20 August 2025. She applied for an unfair dismissal remedy on 24 November 2025, 75 days outside the statutory time limit. The Respondent objected to the application based on the late filing. Hall initially believed Matic Transport was a family trust, but later discovered it was a corporation. The Transport Workers' Union (TWU) assisted Hall in preparing and lodging the application, initially in the wrong jurisdiction (WAIRC).
Police Federation of Australia (Victoria Police Branch) v Chief Commissioner of Police (Victoria)
The Police Federation of Australia (Victoria Police Branch) brought a dispute about how overtime entitlements should be calculated under an enterprise agreement covering Victoria Police officers. The central question was whether short periods of overtime worked across a fortnight, each individually below a 30-minute threshold, could be added together to trigger a payment entitlement. the Chief Commissioner of Police argued that only continuous periods of at least 30 minutes counted. The matter came before the Full Court of the Federal Court on appeal, which also considered whether the Court had jurisdiction to resolve the dispute.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd, a Sydney real estate agency, and its director, the Respondent, have been penalized by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a failure to comply with a Compliance Notice issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. The notice related to unpaid entitlements for a junior real estate worker employed from July to September 2022, when he was 18 years old. The worker was underpaid wages and accrued annual leave entitlements under the Real Estate Industry Award 2020 and the Fair Work Act’s National Employment Standards.
Fair Work Ombudsman
the Applicant, the former sole director and part-owner of Lortoc No. 60 Pty Ltd, has been penalised $22,017 by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. The company previously operated a café called ‘Hakuna Ma’Coffee’ and a food and beverage kiosk called ‘Ric & Co’ in Redcliffe, Queensland. Three workers, two part-time food and beverage attendants and one full-time fast-food employee, were allegedly underpaid. the Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving a request for assistance from the workers, who were employed between September 2022 and March 2023. The company failed to comply with a Compliance Notice and breached pay-slip laws.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has entered into an Enforceable Undertaking with The Luck Bird Pty Ltd, trading as Carlucci’s Restaurant in Templestowe, Melbourne. The restaurant underpaid 38 employees, including visa holders and junior workers, a total of $194,011 between June 2023 and July 2025. The underpayments included minimum hourly rates, penalty rates, overtime rates, annual leave loading, and casual loading. Employees received back payments ranging from $189 to $20,042. The restaurant has rectified the underpayments and implemented systems to prevent future breaches.
FWO v Hidewood Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as Hidewood Signs and Print and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against Hidewood Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as Hidewood Signs and Print and the Respondent. The proceedings involved non-compliance with a compliance notice.
FWO v Growth Executive Talent Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against Growth Executive Talent Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with a compliance notice.
FWO v Azmy Enterprises Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against Azmy Enterprises Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice. This occurred on April 9, 2026.
FWO v Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd and Graeme Drew. The proceedings involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. Details of the specific nature of the non-compliance are not provided in this document.
Fair Work Ombudsman v New Switch Electrical Pty Ltd (Extension of Time)
The Fair Work Ombudsman filed a notice of appeal in the Federal Court of Australia and then applied for orders relating to how that notice could be served on the respondent, New Switch Electrical Pty Ltd. Specifically, the Ombudsman sought three procedural orders: that service be treated as having occurred by a deemed or substituted method under the Federal Court Rules 2011; that the usual requirement to serve the notice of appeal be dispensed with; and that extra time be allowed for service of the notice of appeal. The application concerned procedural steps in the appeal process rather than the underlying merits of any workplace dispute.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Jason Gill, a member of the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA), threatened a colleague in 2021 at Fremantle Harbour. The colleague was crossing a picket line during a dispute between the MUA and Qube Ports Pty Ltd. Gill said the colleague would “end up dead” if he continued working. The affected worker has since experienced panic attacks. The Federal Court found Gill’s threat constituted coercion and adverse action, breaching the Fair Work Act. The union was not held liable for Gill’s actions.
Fair Work Ombudsman v the Respondent (Kwinana Bulk Jetty Case) (Penalty)
The Fair Work Ombudsman brought a penalty proceeding in the Federal Court of Australia against the Respondent following findings that the Respondent had contravened sections 343, 346 and 348 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Those provisions protect employees from adverse action taken to coerce them or because they have exercised, or proposed to exercise, workplace rights. The case became known as the Kwinana Bulk Jetty Case. The penalty hearing required the court to assess the nature, extent and circumstances of the contraventions, any loss or damage suffered, the Respondent's contrition, prior contraventions, and the need for deterrence. The court also considered the double-jeopardy principle under section 556, which prevents a person being penalised twice for the same conduct.
FWO v the Respondent (Kwinana Bulk Jetty Case) (also known as the Fremantle Port matter)
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against the Applicant concerning actions taken at the Kwinana Bulk Jetty, also known as the Fremantle Port matter. The nature of the proceedings involved adverse action and coercion. The decision was made on April 2, 2026.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Southern Cross Care (NSW & ACT) signed an Enforceable Undertaking with the Fair Work Ombudsman and will rectify more than $11.7 million in underpayments, including interest and superannuation, to 5,500 staff. The not-for-profit aged care, home care and retirement living provider operates 27 retirement communities and 27 residential care homes in NSW and the ACT. Affected workers included home care employees, assistants in nursing, registered and enrolled nurses, facility managers, diversional therapists, cooks and handypersons across casual, full-time and part-time roles. The cause was issues with the time and attendance system combined with a manual payroll process inconsistent with enterprise agreement requirements, plus incorrect application of overtime, allowances and shift penalty clauses.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman took legal action against The Ella Group (NSW) Pty Ltd, which operates Funtime Childcare in Greenacre, and its sole director, Louise Ramona Yaacoubian. They failed to comply with a Compliance Notice regarding underpayments to a young early childhood educator employed between April 2021 and May 2023. The worker was aged 20 to 22 during this period. A Fair Work Inspector issued the Compliance Notice in December 2023 after suspecting underpayment of minimum wages, overtime, and annual leave entitlements under the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Fair Work Act’s National Employment Standards. This is the second time the company and director have been penalised for similar issues.
Fair Work Ombudsman
the Applicant, the former operator of Angel Smash Worx in Gosford, NSW, has been penalised $17,502 by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a Fair Work Ombudsman investigation into breaches of pay slip laws and failure to comply with a Compliance Notice. the Applicant employed a worker from August 2018 to April 2022, including a period as an adult apprentice. The worker raised concerns about underpayment of minimum wages, annual leave entitlements, and training costs.
the Applicant v Fair Work Commission
The Applicant brought an interlocutory application in the Federal Court of Australia seeking the recusal of a decision-maker at the Fair Work Commission. The Applicant argued that there was either actual bias or apprehended bias on the part of the relevant member, and that procedural fairness had been denied in the underlying Commission proceedings. The application came before the Federal Court as a challenge to the Commission's conduct rather than to a final substantive decision.
Hitachi Rail STS Australia Pty Ltd v the Respondent
Hitachi Rail STS Australia Pty Ltd sought clarification from the Federal Court about how to calculate penalty rates and overtime under its enterprise agreement. The central dispute was whether certain allowances paid to employees should be counted as part of the 'base hourly rate' when working out those penalty and overtime amounts. A secondary question was whether a waiting time penalty provision, which applies when 'wages' are not paid on time, also applied to unpaid allowances.
FWO v the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against the Applicant. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice and failure to provide payslips. The case was heard on 26 March 2026.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Warwick Institute of Australia Pty Ltd, its director the Respondent, and former finance manager a co-worker. They are accused of allegedly requiring a Brazilian national, employed as a marketing officer in Brisbane between July 2019 and February 2022, to repay over $23,365 through a cashback scheme. The worker was initially employed casually, then full-time on a subclass 482 visa with a salary of $65,000. The allegations include requiring the worker to pay cash to the Respondent for visa sponsorship expenses and making further cash payments to the institute. The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges these payments benefited the institute and its director.
the Applicant v Macquarie Bank Limited
The Applicant brought a discrimination claim in the Federal Court of Australia against Macquarie Bank Limited and individual respondents. The individual respondents had not been named as respondents in the original complaint lodged with the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), though they had been notified of the complaint as persons subject to adverse allegations under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth). The individual respondents applied for summary dismissal of the claims against them on that basis. A separate application was also made to strike out paragraphs in the Applicant's statement of claim that went beyond the scope of the original AHRC complaint.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Hoppers Trailer Pty Ltd, a Melbourne-based trailer manufacturer, and its sole director, Gurpinder Singh, have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a failure to comply with a Compliance Notice issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. The notice concerned unpaid entitlements to a welder, an Indian national on a temporary graduate visa, who was employed from June to October 2022. The company failed to pay accrued annual leave entitlements. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving a request for assistance from the worker.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman took legal action against Veens Group Pty Ltd, a housing construction company in Harrington Park, Sydney, and its sole director, the Respondent. This followed a failure to comply with a Compliance Notice issued in June 2023. The notice related to unpaid wages for a 29-year-old Mandarin-speaking construction worker employed on a student visa. The worker was allegedly underpaid minimum casual wages under the Building and Construction General On-Site Award 2020 for eight days of work in October 2022. The company back-paid some of the amount before and after the Fair Work Ombudsman's legal action.
Fair Work Ombudsman v Torrens University Australia Limited
The Fair Work Ombudsman issued a compliance notice to Torrens University Australia Limited under section 716(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The notice concerned how the university was paying casual academic staff for lecturing work. The dispute turned on the correct interpretation of the Higher Education Industry – Academic Staff – Award 2010 and its 2020 successor. Specifically, it concerned the meaning of 'associated working time' built into the hourly payment rates for casual lecturers. The matter came before the Full Federal Court on appeal.
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jats Joint Pty Ltd
The Fair Work Ombudsman brought proceedings against Jats Joint Pty Ltd concerning the interpretation of the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Award 2010. The central dispute was whether a night shift loading applied to shifts worked before or after a 'sleepover' period, whether a sleepover counts as 'work' under the Award, and whether a sleepover is itself a 'shift'. The case turned on how the Award's provision, that night shift loading is payable for the 'whole of such shift', applies where a shift spans midnight to 6.00 am but includes a sleepover.
the Applicant v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
This case involves an appeal to the Federal Court of Australia from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The Applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, which had upheld the Respondent's refusal to grant her a Student (Temporary) visa (Subclass 590). The appeal centred on whether the primary judge was correct to find that a procedural notice issued by the Tribunal under section 359 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was valid, and whether the Tribunal had additional obligations to inform the Applicant of something before making its decision.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Labour Hire Authority (LHA) and Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) held a forum in Healesville on March 17, 2026, with local growers, industry groups, and labour hire companies. This followed a compliance operation by the LHA and a 2025 report highlighting high non-compliance rates in the Yarra Valley and Mornington Peninsula horticulture sector. Legal action has been initiated against a Yarra Valley orchard and an allegedly unlicensed labour hire company. The FWO has previously secured penalties against horticulture growers for underpayments, exceeding $166,000 against a celery producer and nearly $160,000 against a tomato and cucumber grower. The forum aimed to improve compliance and provide guidance to growers.
FWO v The Ella Group (NSW) Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against The Ella Group (NSW) Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice. The decision was made on 13 March 2026.
the Applicant v CDC Geelong Pty Ltd
A self-represented litigant, Rizkalla, brought a general protections claim under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) against CDC Geelong Pty Ltd and related respondents. The claim sought pecuniary penalties for alleged contraventions of civil penalty provisions. The second to fourth respondents were alleged to have been involved in those contraventions. The matter came before the Federal Court on the respondents' application to strike out Rizkalla's amended statement of claim under rule 16.21 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), on the basis that the pleading was deficient. The pleading apparently incorporated cross-references to a schedule of particulars.
FWO v the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against the Applicant. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice and failure to provide payslips. The case was heard on 13 March 2026.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) are increasing their focus on sham contracting. This occurs when employers misclassify employees as independent contractors to avoid paying entitlements like superannuation, leave, and workers’ compensation. The ATO has observed concerning patterns in industries like building and construction and road freight. The FWO has investigations underway in sectors like building and construction and road transport. One company in Sydney faced penalties for terminating employees and re-engaging them as contractors.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd, a landscaping and gardening materials company based in New South Wales. The company allegedly underpaid four workers a total of $35,716 between 2020 and 2023. The workers held positions including labourer, driver, excavator and were located at Orange, Tea Gardens, Terrey Hills, and Cooranbong. Alleged underpayments included minimum hourly rates, casual loading, annual and personal leave, and overtime. One worker has been fully back-paid, while the others have received partial back-payments.
the Applicant v Technology One Limited (No 7)
This case is the seventh set of proceedings arising from a general protections dispute between the Applicant and Technology One Limited. After the substantive matter was resolved, Technology One applied for a costs order under section 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The key event was a Calderbank offer, which is a formal settlement offer made outside court that can affect who pays costs later, of $2.2 million made by Technology One to the Applicant during the trial. The Applicant did not accept the offer. The Federal Court was asked to decide whether that rejection amounted to unreasonable conduct justifying a costs order against the Applicant.
the Applicant v IP Australia
the Applicant brought a claim against IP Australia, arguing she had been constructively dismissed under section 386(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009. Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee resigns because their employer's conduct left them with no reasonable choice but to leave. The Fair Work Commission found there was no constructive dismissal. the Applicant then sought permission to appeal to the Full Bench of the Commission, which refused permission. She then applied to the Federal Court of Australia, seeking judicial review of the Full Bench's decision on the basis that it was affected by jurisdictional error, meaning the Commission had exceeded or misapplied its legal authority.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Echuca Kebabs Pty Ltd, a take-away food business in Echuca, Victoria, and its sole director, Zekeriye Bilir, have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a failure to comply with a Fair Work Ombudsman Compliance Notice. The notice related to JobKeeper payments and alleged underpayment of minimum wages and annual leave entitlements to a worker employed between 2017 and 2022. The company only made payments to the worker after the Fair Work Ombudsman initiated legal action.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Shinya Geelong HR Pty Ltd and Shinya Torquay HR Pty Ltd, former operators of ramen restaurants in Geelong and Torquay, Victoria, have been penalized for failing to comply with Compliance Notices. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving requests for assistance from four workers, including three visa holders and one Australian citizen. The workers were employed as cooks and waitstaff between November 2020 and July 2023. The Compliance Notices related to underpayment of minimum wages, weekend rates, public holiday rates, and annual leave entitlements.
the Applicant v Chandler Macleod Group Limited
the Applicant brought a claim in the Federal Court of Australia against Chandler Macleod Group Limited and various other respondents. The case came before the court on applications by the respondents for summary judgment and to strike out or set aside the Applicant's claim. The respondents argued that the Originating Application and Statement of Claim had no reasonable prospect of success. Central to the dispute was the Applicant's attempt to relitigate matters that had previously been resolved through deeds of settlement and release. the Applicant also sought to have those deeds set aside, but the court found that claim was inadequately pleaded. The claims also faced expiry issues, though the source text is truncated at that point.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Geng Xu, Jayce Richardson, and Chen Sun, former directors and a former bookkeeper of Ezytenant Pty Ltd, a real estate advertising and management company based in Adelaide. The company has since been liquidated. The case involves a Chinese national employed as a marketing specialist at Ezytenant between January and July 2020, who was on a temporary graduate visa. It is alleged that the worker was required to repay his after-tax wages through a cashback scheme, totaling $10,702 between April and July 2020. The worker was allegedly told to withdraw his wages in cash and hand it over to Xu or Richardson, under threat of termination. The company also allegedly issued false payslips.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Uniting Communities Incorporated, a South Australian community services provider, will return over $2.6 million in underpayments to approximately 1,500 current and former employees. The underpayments occurred between November 2015 and December 2025. They resulted from misapplication of Enterprise Agreements, failure to apply wage increases, and payroll system deficiencies. The organisation self-reported the non-compliance to the Fair Work Ombudsman in May 2023. The affected employees held roles such as support workers, counsellors, and project officers, working across full-time, part-time, and casual positions.
the Applicant v Lygon Court Travel Pty Ltd (No 2)
The Applicant brought a case in the Federal Court of Australia against Lygon Court Travel Pty Ltd and two associated individual respondents. The case concerned alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), specifically failures to keep proper employee records, failures to provide payslips, and failures to pay annual leave loading. The first respondent company admitted to the contraventions, which were carried out by the second and third respondents. The admissions were made after the matter had already been listed for trial.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Respondent, a former part-owner and manager of the ‘Miso World Square’ Japanese restaurant in Sydney. It is alleged that between June 2020 and September 2022, the Respondent was involved in knowingly underpaying 82 workers, primarily cooks, kitchen attendants, and wait staff, a total of over $162,000. The alleged underpayments included flat hourly rates of $19 to $27, failing to pay overtime, penalty rates, accrued annual leave, split-shift allowances, and breaches of record-keeping laws. Many of the affected workers were visa holders from Thailand, Indonesia, and Japan, with 36 being young workers aged 19 to 24. The restaurant closed in 2024 and the employer, Miso Pty Ltd, was deregistered.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Agape Reablement and Support Services NSW Pty Ltd, a Queensland-based disability support services company, and its sole director, Rowell Ian Mammah Llorente. The action follows a Compliance Notice issued in October 2024 regarding alleged underpayment of two disability support workers between November 2023 and May 2024. One worker was casual, and the other was full-time. The alleged underpayments relate to annual leave entitlements for the full-time worker and minimum hourly rates and travel allowances for the casual worker, as per the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated Villa Romana restaurant in Cairns, owned by Mesa 3 Pty Ltd and Helen Papagelou (as trustees of the Ex-RPH Trust). An investigation, following a 2023 inspection, found the restaurant underpaid 76 employees, including those on working holiday and student visas, by a total of $86,873 between May and October 2023. Underpayments related to weekend penalty rates, overtime, split shift allowances, and base rates. The restaurant engaged kitchen and front-of-house staff.
the Applicant v Peabody Energy Australia PCI Mine Management Pty Ltd (No 2)
The Applicant brought a claim against Peabody Energy Australia PCI Mine Management Pty Ltd under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). During the proceedings, the Applicant made an interlocutory application seeking leave to further amend the originating application and statement of claim. In the course of that application, the Applicant provided two further amended statements of claim to the Respondents and supplied extensive material. The Applicant also filed a fifth further amended statement of claim in breach of court orders. The Respondents sought a costs order against the Applicant under section 570 of the Fair Work Act, which limits when costs can be awarded in workplace matters.
Offshore Employers Association Limited v Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
The Offshore Employers Association and the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union were parties to an enterprise agreement covering offshore workers. A dispute arose and was referred to the Fair Work Commission for arbitration. The Commission made an arbitral award. A preliminary question then came before the Federal Court of Australia: did the Commission's award concern the rights of one particular employee, or did it apply to all employees covered by the enterprise agreement? A related issue was whether the parties had widened the scope of the original dispute by agreement after it was first referred to the Commission, and whether any such widening was within the Commission's lawful authority.
FWO v Echuca Kebabs Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Echuca Kebabs Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice. The decision was made on 19 February 2026.
Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (Kwinana Bulk Jetty Case) (Costs)
The Fair Work Ombudsman brought proceedings against the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) and a second respondent under the Fair Work Act 2009 in relation to conduct at the Kwinana Bulk Jetty. The primary proceedings concluded with the court finding the Applicant (the CFMEU) not liable for the actions of the Second Respondent. Following that outcome, a costs application was made. The question before the Federal Court was whether the Applicant's rejection of a settlement offer made during the proceedings amounted to an 'unreasonable act' under section 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act, which would allow a costs order to be made against it. The court considered the factors set out in Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Maritime in assessing whether the rejection of that offer was unreasonable.
FWO v Veens Group Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against Veens Group Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. The decision was made on 19 February 2026.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Threshold Boats Pty Ltd, a Perth boat repair and servicing business, and its sole director and owner, the Respondent. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in September 2024 after suspecting the company underpaid minimum wages and annual leave entitlements to two former employees, a manager and a mechanic. The employees were employed full-time between March 2022 and March 2024. The company allegedly failed to comply with the Compliance Notice, which required back-payment of entitlements totaling $7,749, and the Respondent was allegedly involved.
Fair Work Ombudsman
CareToDance Pty Ltd, a Sydney dance studio, and its director, Cristian Basescu, are facing legal action from the Fair Work Ombudsman. This follows a Fair Work Commission order in December 2024 requiring CareToDance to pay $24,469 in compensation to a former dance instructor, a Filipino national on a skilled working visa, who was unfairly dismissed in July 2024 after being employed since January 2023. The company failed to comply with the compensation order, prompting the legal action.
the Applicant v Fair Work Commission
The Applicant applied to the Federal Court of Australia for an interlocutory injunction. The injunction sought to stop the Fair Work Commission from continuing appeal proceedings and from requiring the Applicant to participate in those proceedings without first lawfully considering a request for reasonable adjustments. The application was partly in the nature of a stay of the Commission proceedings. The Court considered whether there was a serious question to be tried, whether the balance of convenience favoured granting the injunction, and whether exceptional circumstances had been shown.
FWO v Shinya Torquay Pty Ltd and the Respondent
Shinya Torquay Pty Ltd and the Respondent failed to comply with two compliance notices. The Fair Work Ombudsman initiated legal action. The specific details of the non-compliance are not provided in the source text.
FWO v Shinya Geelong HR Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Shinya Geelong HR Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with two compliance notices. The details of the non-compliance are not specified in the provided text.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) has commenced legal action against the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) and two officials, Cody Budgeon and Dylan Howard. The case relates to an incident on November 15, 2024, at a Woolloongabba construction site for the Cross River Rail project. Budgeon and Howard allegedly entered and remained in an exclusion zone without authorisation, delaying work. An exclusion zone was in place due to crane operations. The FWO alleges breaches of the Fair Work Act concerning occupational health and safety and improper behaviour during right-of-entry.
the Applicant v Swinburne University of Technology
the Applicant brought proceedings against Swinburne University of Technology involving matters under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). During those proceedings, he made an interlocutory application in the Federal Court seeking to restrain Swinburne from enforcing a costs order that had been made against him in the Magistrates' Court. The primary judge dismissed that interlocutory application and ordered the Applicant to pay Swinburne’s costs. the Applicant then applied to the Federal Court of Australia for an extension of time and leave to appeal that interlocutory costs order, arguing that the costs protections in section 570 of the Fair Work Act applied and prevented such a costs order being made against him.
the Applicant v QBE Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd
the Applicant brought a claim in the Federal Court of Australia against QBE Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd, seeking declarations of right and related orders under section 21 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). She relied on the Court's accrued jurisdiction to support her claim for ancillary relief. The case raised questions about whether the Federal Court was the appropriate forum, particularly because a specialist tribunal existed as an alternative avenue for the dispute. The matter came before the Court for determination of those jurisdictional and discretionary questions.
Fair Work Ombudsman v Super Retail Group Limited (Listing of trial)
The Fair Work Ombudsman has brought proceedings against Super Retail Group Limited in the Federal Court of Australia. This decision concerns a procedural step only: listing the matter for its final hearing. The court considered the availability of Senior Counsel retained by one of the parties when selecting suitable hearing dates.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Canberra Electrical Solutions Pty Ltd and its director, Tayfun Yildirim, have been penalized for failing to comply with Fair Work Ombudsman Compliance Notices. The company employed two workers—an electrical labourer and an 18-year-old junior apprentice—from February to October 2023. The workers were underpaid minimum wages, annual leave, and overtime. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving requests for assistance from the affected workers.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman took legal action against SNNB Enterprises Pty Ltd, Taylors Business Pty Ltd, and Yarraville Business Pty Ltd, which previously operated Cash Converters stores in Epping, Delahey, and Yarraville. The companies and their sole director, Graeme Grainger, failed to comply with Compliance Notices requiring them to calculate and back-pay entitlements to seven full-time workers. The workers were store managers, retail employees, and shop assistants. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving requests for assistance from the affected workers. The stores have now closed.
the Applicant v Broadway Homes Pty Ltd (No 2)
the Applicant brought a general protections claim against Broadway Homes Pty Ltd after her employment was terminated. She alleged she was dismissed because she exercised, or proposed to exercise, workplace rights, including rights relating to her pay. She also alleged she was underpaid for duties she performed and was not given reasonable notice of termination. The matter was initially commenced in the Fair Work Commission in the same month as her termination before proceeding to the Federal Court. Broadway Homes conceded that a contract of employment existed between the parties.
FWO v Canberra Electrical Solutions Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Canberra Electrical Solutions Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. The specific details of the non-compliance are not provided in the source text.
[2025] FWCFB 293
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) is dealing with the impact of a Federal Court decision regarding delegates’ rights terms in modern awards. The Full Court found that the FWC had exceeded its powers when varying nine awards to include these terms. This has implications for all 155 modern awards, as well as enterprise agreements. The FWC must now vary the nine awards and consider variations to all other awards to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Well Health Medical Services Pty Ltd, formerly operating Well Health Medical Hub in Merrylands, Sydney, and its sole director, the Respondent, have been penalized by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a Fair Work Inspector issuing a Compliance Notice in December 2023 regarding underpayments to a full-time registered nurse employed between October 2020 and September 2023. The Applicant sought assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman. The Compliance Notice related to alleged breaches of the Nurses Award 2020 and the Fair Work Act’s National Employment Standards, including underpayment of minimum wages, annual leave loading, accrued but untaken annual leave, and the worker’s last 46 hours of work.
Fair Work Ombudsman
Workplace Medical Consultants Pty Ltd, a patient transport company in Sydney, and its director, David Zammitt, have been penalized by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed their failure to comply with a Fair Work Ombudsman Compliance Notice. The company employed a patient transport officer from August 2021 to April 2022. The worker was underpaid overtime rates, wages for their final two weeks, and accrued annual leave entitlements. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after a worker requested assistance.
[2026] FWCFB 5
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) is addressing changes required by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023. This Act mandates that modern awards include a 'delegates’ rights term' for workplace delegates. Initially, a Full Bench of the FWC issued a standard term for all awards, but the Federal Court of Australia (FCAFC) later found errors in how the FWC implemented this. The FCAFC ruled the standard term incorrectly limited the scope of delegate representation and communication rights. The current proceedings aim to rectify these errors and ensure compliance with the court's orders, impacting nine specific awards and all other modern awards.
[2026] FWC 34
the Applicant, an employee of BHP Coal Pty Ltd, applied to the Fair Work Commission alleging unfair dismissal. The dismissal followed an altercation with a colleague on January 26, 2025. Prior to the incident, the Applicant alleged his colleague used derogatory nicknames and had attendance issues. the Applicant reported these issues to supervisors, but felt they were being covered up. Tensions escalated due to a dispute over a crib room and the use of a crane overdue for inspection. the Applicant was prescribed medication for acid reflux, which he believed may have affected his mood.
[2026] FWCFB 4
the Applicant, an employee, made several applications to the Fair Work Commission, including a general protections application and a stop bullying application. His employment ended on 13 January 2025. Quantum Systems Pty Ltd and others (the respondents) objected to the Applicant’s application, arguing he had not been dismissed and therefore the Commission lacked jurisdiction. During a hearing, the respondents withdrew their objection. The Applicant then applied for costs, which the Commission dismissed after considering written submissions. the Applicant appealed the decision, seeking permission to appeal and to appeal the costs decision.
Hisense Australia Pty Ltd v the Respondent
Hisense Australia Pty Ltd applied for leave to appeal part of a Federal Court judgment. The primary judge found that Hisense contravened s 535(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and reg 3.42 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) by failing to provide the Applicant with a copy of his employment contract when he requested it. The appeal raised questions about whether an employment contract is a type of record required to be kept under reg 3.32 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth), and whether a request for a copy of an employment contract triggers the Respondent's obligation to produce it.
[2026] FWC 253
the Applicant was dismissed from Exclusive Contracting (WA) Pty Ltd on 25 July 2025, after making comments at a company meeting about Chinese workers in the construction industry. the Applicant, a Ceiling Fixer employed for over two years, claimed the comments were not intended to be offensive. Exclusive Contracting, a commercial wall and ceiling subcontracting business employing workers from various countries, argued the comments were racially offensive. The matter proceeded to the Fair Work Commission under s. 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Enterprise Agreement governing the relationship was the Exclusive Contracting (WA) Pty Ltd / CFMEU South Australian Enterprise Agreement 2023.
[2026] FWC 48
the Applicant worked as a delivery person for Portier Pacific Pty Limited (Uber Eats) from November 2022 until July 2025. On 29 July 2025, Uber Eats deactivated his access to the Uber Delivery Platform. This followed two complaints: one on 22 August 2024, alleging unwanted sexual comments and requests for money, and another on 16 July 2025, alleging inappropriate questions and making the user feel unsafe. Uber Eats temporarily blocked his access while investigating, but provided limited information to the Applicant. the Applicant challenged the deactivation, seeking reinstatement and lost remuneration.
[2026] FWC 173
the Applicant was dismissed from Brian’s Auto Centre Pty Ltd on 7 September 2025. He filed an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on 30 September 2025, one day past the 21-day deadline. the Applicant posted the application via express post from the Gold Coast, and postal delays prevented its delivery to the Commission’s Brisbane office until 30 September 2025. the Respondent raised a jurisdictional objection, arguing the application was filed out of time. the Applicant stated on the application form that it was being lodged within the timeframe, noting a potential one-day delay due to posting.
[2024] FWC 1699
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has made determinations to vary 155 modern awards to include a delegates’ rights term. This change stems from the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023, which aims to strengthen the rights of workplace delegates. The FWC consulted with interested parties and stakeholders before finalizing the term, which will take effect from July 1, 2024. A specific subclause (XA.10) is added to 38 awards to ensure the delegates’ rights term doesn’t conflict with existing, more favorable clauses. The changes relate to representation, communication, access to facilities, and training for delegates.
[2025] FWC 1380
the Applicant made applications to the Fair Work Commission regarding general protections and a stop bullying matter against Quantum-Systems Pty Ltd (the First Respondent) and several associated entities and individuals (the Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Respondents). Following initial applications, the Applicant withdrew the first application and then filed a new application alleging unfair dismissal. The Respondents initially raised a jurisdictional objection, which they later withdrew. Subsequently, the Applicant indicated an intention to pursue legal action in the Federal Court. the Applicant then sought an order for costs against the Respondents.
[2026] FWC 54
Loan Base Pty Ltd sought costs against the Applicant, who had previously filed and then discontinued an unfair dismissal application against the company. The Applicant was dismissed as CEO and director of Loan Base in April 2025, due to performance issues and allegations of serious misconduct, including diverting clients to his own company, Secure Finance Pty Ltd. He claimed procedural deficiencies in his dismissal and lack of payment of entitlements. Loan Base argued it complied with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code and offered to settle the costs application for $50,000, which was rejected.
[2026] FWC 137
Jack Gibson, a teacher at Erindale College, was placed on unpaid leave in January 2023. While overseas in August 2023, he was sent a letter detailing seven allegations of inappropriate behaviour involving students, including contact via social media and driving students to events without school supervision. Gibson responded, denying some allegations and explaining others. He later provided an Admissions Statement acknowledging initiating contact with a student via Instagram. The Australian Capital Territory Education Directorate then referred the matter to the Public Sector Standards Commissioner for investigation.
[2026] FWC 189
Tamara Depp (the Applicant) sought an unfair dismissal remedy from Oz Seaside Hair And Beauty Pty Ltd (the Respondent). The Applicant started working for the business on 16 January 2024, under a previous owner. The Respondent purchased the business on 2 December 2024. A business sale contract included a condition that the Applicant's entitlements to annual and long service leave would be adjusted. The Applicant was offered additional duties and a pay increase on 9 March 2025, and subsequently received a casual employment contract on 23 May 2025. Two incidents occurred involving arguments with the salon manager, Nikki Reid, leading to the Applicant's termination via email on 9 June 2025, followed by a revocation of the notice period on 11 June 2025.
[2026] FWC 51
the Applicant was employed as Operations Manager by The Trustee for Roscon Property Services Trust (Roscon) from March 2022 until her dismissal on May 19, 2025. She claims she was unfairly dismissed while on sick leave, alleging no valid reason and an unfair process. Roscon, a small business with fewer than 15 employees, argues the dismissal followed the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code and was for a valid reason, supported by prior warnings. the Applicant disputes the validity of the warnings and the reason for dismissal, citing stress migraines and a difficult work environment. She was notified of her termination via email on May 16, 2025, after leaving work due to illness.
[2026] FWC 2
ALDI Foods Pty Ltd sought approval for three enterprise agreements: the ALDI Stapylton Agreement 2025, ALDI Prestons Agreement 2024, and ALDI Jandakot Agreement 2025. Previously, the Fair Work Commission found these agreements didn't meet the 'better off overall test' (BOOT) for part-time warehouse employees. This decision addresses whether to approve the agreements with amendments to address the BOOT concern. The concern stemmed from unpredictable work hours for hourly-rate part-time warehouse employees, as the agreements lacked requirements for advance notice of work times. The Commission previously proposed an amendment requiring ALDI to agree with employees on a regular work pattern.
[2025] FWC 3130
ALDI Foods Pty Ltd sought approval for three enterprise agreements: the ALDI Prestons Agreement 2024, the ALDI Jandakot Agreement 2025, and the ALDI Stapylton Agreement 2025. The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) opposed the applications, arguing the agreements didn't meet the 'better off overall test' (BOOT). The United Workers Union (UWU) supported the Stapylton Agreement, while the Transport Workers Union of Australia (TWU) supported the Jandakot Agreement but didn't express a view on the Prestons Agreement. The SDA's concerns centered on warehouse employees described as Hourly Rate employees, claiming they weren't better off than if the Storage Services and Wholesale Award 2020 applied.
[2026] FWC 59
the Applicant, a casual employee, worked as a Guest Service Agent at Airport Tourist Village Melbourne (ATVM), operated by RB Enterprises, from October 2023. RB Enterprises was transitioning ATVM from a caravan park to a hotel. On August 15, 2025, the Applicant inquired about his roster and was told there were budget issues and no further shifts for a few weeks. He then received a text message on August 19, 2025, stating his employment was terminated. the Applicant challenged the dismissal, claiming he was unfairly dismissed. RB Enterprises argued the Applicant was not entitled to unfair dismissal protections because he wasn't a regular casual employee.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Korserv Pty Ltd, a Queensland-based labour hire provider, and its manager, the Respondent. This action follows an audit of pay rates at a strawberry farm in the Glass House Mountains in 2023. Korserv allegedly provided false records, including falsified payslips and piecework agreements with forged signatures, to Fair Work Inspectors in December 2023 and January 2024. It is alleged that Korserv subcontracted other companies to pay wages, and the Respondent admitted to sending funds to these subcontractors. At least three of the 14 workers involved were migrant workers on visas.
FWO v SNNB Enterprises Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against SNNB Enterprises Pty Ltd and Graeme John Grainger. The case involved non-compliance with four compliance notices. The decision was made on January 21, 2026.
FWO v Taylors Business Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against Taylors Business Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with four compliance notices. The decision was made on 21 January 2026.
FWO v Yarraville Business Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Yarraville Business Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with four compliance notices. The decision was made on 21 January 2026.
FWO v Workplace Medical Consultants Pty Ltd and the Respondent
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against Workplace Medical Consultants Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The case involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. The decision was made on January 15, 2026.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Rapid Plumbing Group Pty Ltd, a Western Sydney plumbing company, and its sole director, the Respondent. A young worker was employed as a plumber by Rapid Plumbing Group from July to October 2022. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in February 2023, alleging the company failed to pay the worker industry allowances and accrued annual leave entitlements. The company allegedly failed to comply with the Compliance Notice.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Blake Bray, the former owner and director of Terra Nova Interiors Pty Ltd, a joinery and cabinet-making company based in Western Sydney. The company went into liquidation. Two full-time employees, one of whom was 16 years old, sought assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman. Inspectors issued Compliance Notices in June and August 2023, alleging underpayment of minimum wages, annual leave entitlements, and overtime rates. The alleged unpaid entitlements were based on the Clerks – Private Sector Award 2020, Joinery and Building Trades Award 2020, and the Fair Work Act’s National Employment Standards. The company was required to back-pay $9,576.
Fair Work Ombudsman
The Fair Work Ombudsman secured a penalty against the University of New South Wales (UNSW) for record-keeping failures. Between 2017 and 2022, UNSW failed to keep records for 63 casual academic employees, including hours worked, pay rates, and casual loading entitlements. They also failed to include casual loading information on pay slips. The Fair Work Ombudsman first raised concerns in 2018, and a formal underpayment investigation began in 2020 after UNSW self-reported widespread underpayments. The legal action focused on staff in the UNSW Business School at Kensington, Sydney.
the Applicant v Arbias Limited
the Applicant was employed by Arbias Limited, a healthcare provider, from September 2019 until March 2026. In February 2026, the Applicant was directed to take on a new role as a Disability Support Worker, which involved different work than his previous Specialist Case Manager position. He expressed concerns about the change and its impact on his wellbeing. Following this, he requested to work from home but the request was denied. On March 17, 2026, Arbias Limited terminated the Applicant’s employment, citing his failure to return to work.