the Applicant v Lygon Court Travel Pty Ltd (No 2)
At a glance
- $55,000
- 1
- MA000004
What happened
The Applicant brought a case in the Federal Court of Australia against Lygon Court Travel Pty Ltd and two associated individual respondents. The case concerned alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), specifically failures to keep proper employee records, failures to provide payslips, and failures to pay annual leave loading. The first respondent company admitted to the contraventions, which were carried out by the second and third respondents. The admissions were made after the matter had already been listed for trial.
What was decided
The court found contraventions of sections 45, 535, and 536 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) were established. The court considered the nature and extent of the conduct, the fact that admissions were only made after the case was set down for trial, an apology that was offered, and corrective action taken by the respondents. The court then assessed appropriate pecuniary penalties, weighing both specific and general deterrence. The court also considered whether declarations of contravention were appropriate. The late timing of the admissions was a relevant factor in the penalty assessment.
What it means for employers
Employers must keep accurate employee records, issue proper payslips, and pay all entitlements including annual leave loading. Admitting to breaches only after a matter is listed for trial will be taken into account when penalties are set, meaning earlier cooperation may result in more favourable outcomes. Corrective action and a genuine apology can be considered in mitigation, but they do not remove the need for penalties aimed at deterring future non-compliance.
What it means for employees
Employees are entitled to accurate payslips, proper employment records, and full payment of entitlements such as annual leave loading. If an employer fails to meet these obligations, employees can bring a claim in the Federal Court. A successful case can result in the court imposing financial penalties on the employer and making formal declarations that the law was broken.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.