Grofski v Peabody Energy Australia PCI Mine Management Pty Ltd (No 2)
Citation: [2026] FCA 124
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
The applicant, Grofski, brought a claim against Peabody Energy Australia PCI Mine Management Pty Ltd under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). During the proceedings, Grofski made an interlocutory application (a procedural step taken during an ongoing case, before a final hearing) seeking leave to further amend the originating application and statement of claim. In the course of that application, Grofski provided two further amended statements of claim to the respondents and supplied extensive material. Grofski also filed a fifth further amended statement of claim in breach of court orders. The respondents sought a costs order against Grofski under section 570 of the Fair Work Act, which limits when costs can be awarded in workplace matters.
What was decided
The court considered whether section 570 of the Fair Work Act was engaged by Grofski's conduct in prosecuting the interlocutory application. Section 570 generally prevents costs orders in Fair Work matters unless a party acted vexatiously or without reasonable cause, or caused costs to be incurred unreasonably. The court examined whether Grofski's conduct, including providing extensive material to the respondents and filing a further amended statement of claim in breach of orders, met the threshold required under section 570 to justify a costs award. The source text is truncated and does not record the final costs ruling.
What it means for employers
Employers in Fair Work proceedings should be aware that section 570 of the Fair Work Act sets a high bar for recovering legal costs, even when an employee repeatedly amends their claim or breaches court orders. However, conduct such as filing documents in breach of orders may still support a costs application. Employers should document any procedural breaches carefully and seek legal advice before applying for costs.
What it means for employees
Employees pursuing Fair Work claims are generally protected from paying the other side's legal costs, but that protection is not absolute. Filing documents in breach of court orders or conducting proceedings in a way that unreasonably increases costs can put a costs order at risk. Employees should follow all court directions carefully and take legal advice before making multiple amendments to their claim.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2026/2026fca0124This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →