Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 7 May 2026

FWO v the Applicant and the Second Respondent

Citation: FWO-LIT/2025-2026/bharathi-karnati-and-ravikanth-baddam/2026-05-08

At a glance

Respondent
Bharathi Karnati and Ravikanth Baddam
Penalty
$40,000

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced litigation against the Applicant and the Second Respondent. The proceedings involved allegations of providing false documents, underpayments, failing to provide payslips, and record-keeping contraventions. The case was heard on 8 May 2026.

What was decided

The Applicant and the Second Respondent were penalised $40,000 for their workplace law breaches. The Fair Work Ombudsman pursued legal action due to the nature of the contraventions. A decision has been made but is not yet available online.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure accurate record-keeping practices and provide payslips as required by law. Providing false documents carries significant penalties. Employers should review their payroll processes and compliance with workplace laws.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to receive payslips and be paid correctly. If you suspect underpayment or other breaches of workplace law, contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for assistance.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratespublic-holidaysrecord-keepingwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/about-us/compliance-and-enforcement/litigation/2025-2026-litigation-outcomes

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases