Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 2 November 2025

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2025-11-03-armstrong-cn-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Cruise Control Australia Parking Sydney
Penalty
$7,981
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000213

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated Bradley Armstrong, the operator of 'Cruise Control Australia Parking Sydney', after a worker requested assistance. The worker was employed on a casual basis as a car parking officer in 2023. The Fair Work Ombudsman issued a Compliance Notice in May 2024, believing the Applicant had underpaid penalty rates for weekend and overtime work between August and October 2023. The Applicant partially back-paid the worker's entitlements before court action. The worker's entitlements were owed under the Car Parking Award 2020.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a penalty of $7,981 against the Applicant for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The court ordered him to back-pay the remaining entitlements owed to the worker, plus interest and superannuation. Judge Lisa Doust found his failure to comply demonstrated a disregard for his obligations. The penalty aims to ensure future compliance and deter other employers. The Fair Work Ombudsman stressed the importance of acting on Compliance Notices.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in court-imposed penalties and further back-payment obligations. Understanding and fulfilling obligations under awards and ensuring accurate pay calculations are crucial.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are concerned about their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. The Fair Work Ombudsman provides resources and support for employees to understand their rights and obligations.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationgeneral-protectionscompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/november-2025/20251103-armstrong-cn-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases