Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 11 March 2024

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2024-03-12-incode-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Incode Engineers Pty Ltd
Penalty
$18,500
Employees affected
2

What happened

Incode Engineers Pty Ltd, a structural engineering company based in Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, and its director, Thomas Marxson, have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a failure to comply with a Compliance Notice issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. The notice related to underpayments to two employees: a full-time engineer and a part-time administration officer, between May and August 2021. One worker received partial back-payment before proceedings, but the other’s underpayments remained outstanding until legal action commenced. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving requests for assistance from the workers.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a penalty of $16,500 against Incode Engineers Pty Ltd and $2,000 against Thomas Marxson. The penalties were for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The Fair Work Ombudsman emphasised that businesses ignoring Compliance Notices face penalties and back-pay orders. The court’s decision highlights the importance of responding to Compliance Notices and ensuring employees receive correct pay and entitlements.

What it means for employers

Employers must act promptly and appropriately when issued with a Compliance Notice from the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant financial penalties and orders to back-pay employees. Understanding obligations under awards and the National Employment Standards is crucial.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are not receiving correct entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Early intervention can prevent further issues and ensure proper compensation.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationcompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/march-2024/20240312-incode-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases