Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-03-12-incode-penalty-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Incode Engineers Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $18,500
- Employees affected
- 2
What happened
Incode Engineers Pty Ltd, a structural engineering company based in Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, and its director, Thomas Marxson, have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a failure to comply with a Compliance Notice issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. The notice related to underpayments to two employees: a full-time engineer and a part-time administration officer, between May and August 2021. One worker received partial back-payment before proceedings, but the other’s underpayments remained outstanding until legal action commenced. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving requests for assistance from the workers.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a penalty of $16,500 against Incode Engineers Pty Ltd and $2,000 against Thomas Marxson. The penalties were for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The Fair Work Ombudsman emphasised that businesses ignoring Compliance Notices face penalties and back-pay orders. The court’s decision highlights the importance of responding to Compliance Notices and ensuring employees receive correct pay and entitlements.
What it means for employers
Employers must act promptly and appropriately when issued with a Compliance Notice from the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant financial penalties and orders to back-pay employees. Understanding obligations under awards and the National Employment Standards is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are not receiving correct entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Early intervention can prevent further issues and ensure proper compensation.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/march-2024/20240312-incode-penalty-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →