Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-02-12-easy-vaping-penalty-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- The Easy Vaping Company Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $37,485
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman secured penalties against The Easy Vaping Company Pty Ltd and its husband-and-wife operators, Kate Dillon Chan and Edward Chan. They exploited a Chinese worker sponsored on a 457 visa between 2017 and 2020. The company pressured the worker to participate in an unlawful cashback arrangement, requiring him to withdraw cash from his wages and hand it over to Mr Chan. The worker was paid a total of $13,000 in back-pay after the Fair Work Ombudsman intervened.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $26,775 penalty against The Easy Vaping Company Pty Ltd and $5,355 penalties against Kate Dillon Chan and Edward Chan. The court found the company and individuals deliberately breached workplace laws. Judge Obradovic described the cashback arrangement as “deceitful” and a “calculated strategy”. The penalties are intended to deter similar exploitative conduct. The Fair Work Ombudsman has secured $15 million in penalties in visa holder litigations since 2017.
What it means for employers
Employers must ensure they comply with workplace laws, regardless of a worker's visa status. Unlawful cashback arrangements and other exploitative practices will not be tolerated. Employers need to be aware of their obligations to pay the correct minimum wage and avoid deceptive practices to disguise non-compliance.
What it means for employees
Visa holders have the same workplace rights as Australian citizens. Employees should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they believe their pay or entitlements are being withheld or if they are pressured into unlawful arrangements.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/february-2024/20240212-easy-vaping-penalty-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →