Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 18 October 2023

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2023-10-19-checs-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Community Health, Emergency Care and Support (CHECS) Pty Ltd
Penalty
$27,000
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000113

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated Community Health, Emergency Care and Support (CHECS) Pty Ltd, a Logan-based company providing home care and disability services in South-East Queensland. The investigation arose from a request for assistance from a disability support worker. CHECS failed to comply with a Compliance Notice issued in June 2022, which required back-payment of entitlements to the worker for two days of employment in October-November 2021. The worker was not paid wages owed under the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a penalty of $27,000 against CHECS Pty Ltd for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The court also ordered CHECS to take action required by the Compliance Notice, including back-paying the worker. Fair Work Ombudsman Anna Booth stated that failing to act on Compliance Notices can result in penalties and back-payment obligations. The FWO prioritises compliance in the care sector.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly those in the care sector, must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and back-payment obligations. Employers should review their payroll practices and seek advice if unsure about their obligations.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have not received their correct pay or entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. The Fair Work Ombudsman offers online courses and resources for employers and employees.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationcompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2023-media-releases/october-2023/20231019-checs-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases