Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2023-03-02-jacz-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- JACZ Holdings Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $33,300
- Employees affected
- 1
- Awards cited
- MA000047, MA000048
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against JACZ Holdings Pty Ltd, a residential building company based in Heidelberg Heights, and its director, the Respondent. The investigation began after a request for assistance from a young apprentice bricklayer who worked for the company between March 2020 and January 2022. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in July 2022, alleging the company failed to reimburse training fees and underpaid the apprentice’s minimum rates under relevant awards. The company did not comply with the notice.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is taking JACZ Holdings Pty Ltd and the Respondent to court for failing to comply with a Compliance Notice. The company faces a potential penalty of up to $33,300, and the Respondent faces a potential penalty of up to $6,660. The court is also expected to order the company to rectify the alleged underpayment, including interest and superannuation. A directions hearing is scheduled for March 3, 2023.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements, plus interest and superannuation. Employers should ensure they are meeting their obligations regarding apprentice wages and training reimbursement.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been underpaid or have not received proper training reimbursement should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. The Fair Work Ombudsman provides resources and support for employees to understand their workplace rights.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2023-media-releases/march-2023/20230302-jacz-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections