Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 21 February 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-02-22-buchanan-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$14,000
Employees affected
1

What happened

Khan Andrew Buchanan, who operates RiverCity Bus Service in Queensland, was penalized for unlawfully requiring a casual bus driver to repay JobKeeper payments. Between 2017 and 2020, Mr. Buchanan received fortnightly JobKeeper payments of $1500 for the driver. He then required the driver to repay amounts equal to the difference between the net JobKeeper payment and the driver’s wages. In total, the driver repaid $5805. In September 2020, Mr. Buchanan also failed to pass on the full JobKeeper payment to the driver. A Fair Work Inspector investigated after the driver requested assistance.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $14,000 penalty against Mr. Buchanan for breaching the Fair Work Act. The court described his conduct as 'reprehensible', 'deliberate', and 'calculated'. Mr. Buchanan has already back-paid the driver $6270.40 to rectify the underpayments. Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker emphasized the importance of upholding the integrity of government programs and warned against cashbacks. Judge Vasta highlighted the breach of trust and lack of apology from Mr. Buchanan.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure they comply with all legal requirements when receiving and distributing government assistance payments like JobKeeper. Requiring employees to repay wages or portions of government assistance is generally unlawful and can result in significant penalties. Transparency and adherence to the Fair Work Act are crucial.

What it means for employees

Employees who receive government assistance payments through their employer are entitled to receive the full amount. If an employer requires repayment of wages or portions of government assistance, employees should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for assistance.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratessham-contractingwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/february-2022/20220222-buchanan-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases