Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 20 February 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-02-21-smart-vision-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Smart Vision Developments (Qld) Pty Ltd
Penalty
$33,300
Employees affected
2
Awards cited
MA000173

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against Smart Vision Developments (Qld) Pty Ltd and its director, John Atkinson, former operators of Grand Central Cafe in Townsville, Queensland. The action followed requests for assistance from two workers employed as food and beverage attendants from June to September 2020. A Fair Work Inspector issued Compliance Notices in March 2021, alleging the workers were underpaid minimum wage, overtime, weekend, and annual leave entitlements, as well as payment-in-lieu-of-notice. The company allegedly failed to comply with these notices.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against Smart Vision Developments (Qld) Pty Ltd and John Atkinson for failing to comply with Compliance Notices. The maximum penalty for a company is $33,300 per contravention, and for an individual, $6,660 per contravention. The FWO also seeks an order for the company to rectify any underpayments, including interest and superannuation. A directions hearing is scheduled for April 2022.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements plus interest and superannuation. Businesses should ensure they understand and meet their obligations regarding employee pay and entitlements.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are concerned about their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Interpreter services are available.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesannual-leavecompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/february-2022/20220221-smart-vision-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases