Panda Mart Trading Pty Ltd v the Respondent
Citation: [2026] FWCFB 206
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
Panda Mart Trading Pty Ltd dismissed the Applicant and the Fair Work Commission initially found the dismissal unfair, awarding the Applicant $14,269.46 in compensation plus superannuation. Panda Mart appealed this decision, seeking permission to appeal. The company failed to attend multiple hearings, including a determinative conference and a hearing regarding the appeal’s permission. The Commission proceeded in Panda Mart’s absence, relying on the Applicant’s sworn evidence and submissions.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench refused Panda Mart’s application for permission to appeal the earlier decision. The bench found Panda Mart’s grounds for appeal did not present an arguable case of appealable error. They noted Panda Mart’s failure to attend hearings and the missed opportunity to present evidence. The application was also deemed invalid due to being filed outside the prescribed timeframe. The appeal application was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers must diligently participate in Fair Work Commission proceedings. Failure to attend hearings, even with doubts about the case, can lead to decisions being made against them. Ignoring Commission directions can severely prejudice a company’s position and prevent them from presenting crucial evidence.
What it means for employees
Employees should document all relevant information and attend hearings when required. If an employer fails to participate in proceedings, the Commission can proceed in their absence, potentially leading to a favourable outcome for the employee.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwcfb206.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections