the Applicant v Sydney Trains
Citation: [2026] FWCFB 182
What happened
the Applicant appealed a Fair Work Commission decision made on May 14, 2026, by the Commissioner. The original decision dismissed the Applicant’s application for anti-bullying orders against named individuals at Sydney Trains. the Commissioner found that there was no evidence suggesting she would be certified fit to work with those individuals and that she had sought the order to punish them. the Applicant argued several points, including disputing the finding of no present risk of bullying and alleging denial of procedural fairness.
What was decided
A Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission refused the Applicant permission to appeal the earlier decision. The bench found that her grounds for appeal did not reveal a cogent arguable case of error. They noted the Commissioner’s finding was supported by the evidence and there was no basis to doubt its correctness. Permission to appeal was also denied because it wasn't in the public interest, as the Applicant could reapply if circumstances changed.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they have robust processes for addressing workplace bullying complaints and documenting any medical assessments related to an employee’s return to work. Decisions are based on evidence so gathering appropriate information is key.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking anti-bullying orders need to provide sufficient evidence of a risk of future bullying. Repeated applications may be dismissed, potentially leading to cost implications if deemed frivolous.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwcfb182.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →