Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd Trading AS Peerless

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2341

What happened

Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd, operating as Peerless, sought approval for the Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd (Refinery) Enterprise Agreement 2025. The United Workers Union (UWU) supported the agreement and intends to be covered by it. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement for employees in the food, beverages, and tobacco manufacturing industry. The application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd (Refinery) Enterprise Agreement 2025 on 27 August 2026. The Commission found the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act were met. While some provisions may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES), the more beneficial NES entitlements will prevail. The UWU supports the agreement and will be covered by it.

What it means for employers

Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements must ensure they comply with sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act. They should also consider potential inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards and ensure the agreement’s terms are more beneficial or equivalent to those mandated by the NES.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd (Refinery) Enterprise Agreement 2025 will receive the entitlements outlined in the agreement. Where the agreement conflicts with the National Employment Standards, the NES entitlements will apply.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2341.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases