Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Spective Group Pty Ltd Trading AS Spective Group

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2300

What happened

Spective Group Pty Ltd, trading as Spective Group, applied for approval of the Spective Group Pty Ltd T/As Spective Group and the TFTU Enterprise Agreement 2026-2030. The Timber, Furnishing and Textiles Union (TFTU) is the bargaining representative and supports the agreement's approval. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement and does not cover all employees, but the group of employees was fairly chosen. The TFTU has notified its intention to be covered by the agreement.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Spective Group Pty Ltd T/As Spective Group and the TFTU Enterprise Agreement 2026-2030 on 24 August 2026. The Commission was satisfied that the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. The 'better off overall test' was also considered. The TFTU, as a bargaining representative, will be covered by the agreement.

What it means for employers

the Respondent seeking to implement enterprise agreements must ensure they meet all requirements of the Fair Work Act, including sections 186, 187, and 188. They must also consider the 'better off overall test' and fairly choose the group of employees covered by the agreement.

What it means for employees

the Applicant should be aware of the terms and conditions outlined in the Spective Group Pty Ltd T/As Spective Group and the TFTU Enterprise Agreement 2026-2030, particularly if they are covered by the agreement. The TFTU will also be covered by the agreement.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2300.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases