Application by Doka Formwork Australia Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 2253
What happened
Doka Formwork Australia Pty Ltd sought to vary its Doka Emu Plains And Mount Druitt Enterprise Agreement 2026. The company identified a typographical error in clause 2.1.4 of the agreement. This clause incorrectly described the work locations covered by the agreement. The application aimed to correct this error to provide clarity and certainty for both the employer and employees.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the variation of the enterprise agreement. the Commissioner found clause 2.1.4 contained an obvious typographical error. The clause was replaced with a revised version specifying that employees covered by the agreement are those engaged as Warehouse, Yard or Workshop Employees at the company's Emu Plains and Mount Druitt locations. The variation took effect from 19 August 2026.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully review enterprise agreements for typographical errors or inconsistencies. Correcting these errors through a formal variation process can clarify obligations and reduce potential disputes. This case highlights the process for amending agreements to ensure accuracy.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of the terms of their enterprise agreement and any changes made to it. This case demonstrates how errors in agreements can be corrected, ensuring clarity about who is covered and where they work.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2253.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections