Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2241

What happened

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) applied for approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement, named the S&S Fire Protection Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Fire Protection Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027, covers a single workplace. A minor procedural error occurred in the notice given to employees regarding their representational rights.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement. The Commission found the error in the employee notice was a minor technical issue. It did not disadvantage employees. The agreement was deemed genuinely agreed to and met all relevant requirements of the Fair Work Act. The agreement also covers the CEPU.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure all notices to employees regarding representational rights are in the prescribed form. While minor errors can be overlooked, it's crucial to avoid procedural issues that could delay or prevent enterprise agreement approval.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights regarding enterprise agreements. While a minor error occurred in this case, employees should receive proper notice of their representational rights before an agreement is finalized.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2241.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases