Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd Trading AS Teys Australia Beenleigh

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2233

What happened

Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd sought approval for the 'Teys Beenleigh Production Employees Enterprise Agreement'. The application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. A minor discrepancy existed in the employer's name on the Notice of Employee Representational Rights. The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) indicated their desire for the agreement to cover them.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Teys Beenleigh Production Employees Enterprise Agreement. the Commissioner noted a minor technical error in the employer's name on the NERR, deeming it insignificant. The Commission confirmed the agreement covers the AMIEU and will operate from August 25, 2026, expiring August 18, 2030. Written undertakings from the Applicant were accepted as terms of the agreement, ensuring no financial detriment to employees and no substantial changes to the agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure accuracy in documentation, particularly notices to employees, to avoid potential delays or challenges to enterprise agreement approval. Providing clear and legally sound undertakings can facilitate the approval process and demonstrate commitment to employee wellbeing.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights regarding enterprise agreements and ensure their union is notified of their desire for coverage. The agreement ensures that the National Employment Standards (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2233.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases