Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Plantic Technologies Limited

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2198

What happened

Plantic Technologies Limited applied to have the 'Plantic (Altona Unit 2) AWU – Enterprise Agreement 2026 – 2029' approved. The Australian Workers Union (AWU) supports the agreement and seeks to be covered by it. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement and does not cover all employees, but the group of employees was fairly chosen. The employer provided written undertakings.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement. The Commission found that the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. The Commission noted potential inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards (NES) but stated the NES will prevail. A model consultation term and a workplace delegates’ rights term were also taken to be terms of the agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure enterprise agreements comply with the Fair Work Act 2009, including sections 186, 187, and 188. They should also be aware that the National Employment Standards will take precedence over any conflicting terms in the agreement. Providing written undertakings can be a factor in approval.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights under the National Employment Standards, as these will apply if there are inconsistencies in the enterprise agreement. The Australian Workers Union will be covered by the agreement.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2198.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases