Application by Top End Group Training Trading AS Gtnt Group
Citation: [2026] FWCA 2164
What happened
Top End Group Training T/A GTNT Group applied for approval of the GTNT Group Enterprise Agreement 2026 to 2028 under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement covering employees in the clerical industry. Concerns were raised about a potential deficiency related to the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR).
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the GTNT Group Enterprise Agreement 2026 to 2028. The Commissioner found that any discrepancies regarding the NERR did not disenfranchise employees from the bargaining process. Clauses inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES) will be superseded by the NES. Several written undertakings were provided and accepted as terms of the agreement. A model flexibility term, and a workplace delegates’ rights term from the Clerks – Private Sector Award 2020, are also incorporated into the agreement.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure compliance with all requirements under the Fair Work Act when developing enterprise agreements. Pay close attention to procedural steps like providing accurate NERR information and ensuring consistency with the National Employment Standards. Any discrepancies must be addressed to avoid delays in approval.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by this agreement will benefit from terms negotiated through collective bargaining. However, where the agreement conflicts with the National Employment Standards, the NES provisions will apply. Employees should review the full agreement and any undertakings to understand their entitlements.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2164.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →