Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Royal Automobile Club Of Victoria Limited (Racv)

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2058

What happened

Royal Automobile Club of Victoria Limited (RACV) applied for approval of the RACV Club and Resorts Collective Agreement 2026, which covers RACV and Club Tasmania Holdings Pty Ltd. Several issues were raised with RACV's application, leading to written undertakings being provided. The United Workers’ Union (UWU), a bargaining representative, did not object to these undertakings. The agreement does not contain a workplace delegates rights term.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the RACV Club and Resorts Collective Agreement 2026. The Commissioner was satisfied that the undertakings would not cause financial detriment to employees and are considered terms of the agreement. A prescribed workplace delegates’ rights term from the relevant award will apply. The UWU is covered by the agreement, and it will operate seven days after approval.

What it means for employers

Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements should be prepared to address issues raised during the application process with written undertakings. These undertakings become legally binding terms of the agreement. Ensure compliance with all relevant legislative requirements, including those relating to workplace delegate rights.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the RACV Club and Resorts Collective Agreement 2026 will benefit from the approved agreement and associated undertakings. The UWU is also covered under this agreement. Employees should be aware that a prescribed workplace delegates’ rights term applies due to its absence in the agreement.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variationgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2058.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases