Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Foodmach Pty Ltd Trading AS Foodmach

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1929

What happened

Foodmach Pty Ltd applied to have its Foodmach PTY LTD Enterprise Agreement 2026 approved. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement covering employees in manufacturing and associated industries. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) are bargaining representatives for the agreement.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Foodmach PTY LTD Enterprise Agreement 2026. The Commissioner found that the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Fair Work Act were met. The agreement will operate seven days after approval. It covers both the AMWU and CEPU.

What it means for employers

Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements must ensure they comply with all relevant sections of the Fair Work Act, including those relating to interaction with the National Employment Standards (NES). A ‘NES precedence clause’ is required where an agreement provides for outcomes different from the NES.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the Foodmach PTY LTD Enterprise Agreement 2026 will be subject to its terms. The agreement acknowledges that the NES takes precedence unless the agreement offers a more favourable outcome. Unions representing employees are entitled to be covered under approved enterprise agreements.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1929.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases