Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Trivium Australia Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1814

What happened

Trivium Australia Pty Ltd sought approval for its 'Defence Projects (WA) Agreement 2026'. The company applied under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. They provided written undertakings to address potential concerns. Bargaining representatives were consulted and raised no objections. The agreement covers a single enterprise.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Trivium Australia Pty Ltd Defence Projects (WA) Agreement 2026, effective from July 20, 2026, expiring on July 13, 2030. the Commissioner noted some clauses potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES), particularly regarding public holiday substitution and instant dismissal. However, a clause stating that NES entitlements prevail in cases of inconsistency ensured approval.

What it means for employers

Employers should carefully review enterprise agreements to ensure consistency with the National Employment Standards. Specifically, provisions around public holidays and disciplinary procedures require close scrutiny to avoid being overly restrictive or inconsistent with Fair Work Regulations.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by this agreement should be aware that the National Employment Standards will apply if there is a conflict between the agreement's terms and those standards. This ensures employees receive at least the minimum entitlements guaranteed under the NES.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variationpublic-holidaysgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1814.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases