Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Gitani Corp Pty Ltd Trading AS Gitani Stone

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1801

What happened

Gitani Corp Pty Ltd, trading as Gitani Stone, applied for approval of a new enterprise agreement, called the Gitani Corp Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2026 – 2030. The application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This is a single enterprise agreement covering employees in the building, metal and civil construction industries.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Gitani Corp Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2026 – 2030. The Commissioner found that all relevant requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act were met. Any inconsistencies between the agreement and the National Employment Standards (NES) will be resolved in favour of the NES. The agreement commenced on July 20, 2026, and expires on July 13, 2030.

What it means for employers

Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements must ensure they comply with all requirements outlined in sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act. They also need to consider how their agreement interacts with the National Employment Standards (NES) and ensure that the more beneficial entitlements always apply.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the Gitani Corp Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2026 – 2030 will have certain terms and conditions of employment outlined in the agreement. If there's a conflict between the agreement and the National Employment Standards, the NES provisions will take precedence.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1801.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases