Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by CSL Australia Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1734

What happened

CSL Australia Pty Ltd sought approval for an enterprise agreement, the CSL Australia and MUA WA BCI Operations Enterprise Agreement 2026, covering employees and the Maritime Union of Australia Division. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Several clauses were identified as potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). The union representing the employees notified their desire to be covered by the agreement.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement. While some clauses appeared inconsistent with the NES, the Commission noted a clause stating that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES would prevail where there was an inconsistency. The agreement will operate from 10 July 2026 and expire on 10 July 2030. The Maritime Union of Australia Division is covered by the agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure enterprise agreements align with the National Employment Standards, or include a clause ensuring NES entitlements are always more beneficial to employees. Careful review of all clauses is necessary before seeking approval for an enterprise agreement.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by this agreement benefit from its terms but also have the assurance that the National Employment Standards will provide more favourable conditions where conflicts arise. It's important to understand how the agreement interacts with NES entitlements.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationpublic-holidays

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1734.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases