Application by Re.Cycle (Browns Plains) Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1728
What happened
Re.Cycle (Browns Plains) Pty Ltd sought approval for its enterprise agreement, the Re.Cycle Browns Plains MRF Enterprise Agreement 2026. The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) represents a majority of employees covered by the agreement, which applies to work in the waste management industry.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Re.Cycle Browns Plains MRF Enterprise Agreement 2026. The Deputy President found it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and is a greenfields agreement. It will operate under section 54 of the Act, expiring on January 31, 2029. The Commission noted that entitlements in the National Employment Standards (NES) will prevail where there's an inconsistency.
What it means for employers
Employers entering into greenfields agreements should ensure they comply with all relevant sections of the Fair Work Act 2009 and consult appropriately with employee representatives like the TWU. They must also be aware that the NES takes precedence over the enterprise agreement where there is a conflict.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by the approved Re.Cycle Browns Plains MRF Enterprise Agreement 2026 will have their employment terms governed by this agreement, but remember that entitlements under the National Employment Standards (NES) are more beneficial if they differ from those in the agreement.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1728.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →