Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Securetel (Aust) Pty. Ltd. Trading AS Securetel

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1727

What happened

Securetel (Aust) Pty. Ltd. (the Employer) applied to terminate the Securetel (Aust) Pty. Ltd. and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021, which expired on March 31, 2021. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (ETU) is covered by the agreement. The Employer stated it has no employees currently or likely to be covered by the agreement and is not a trading entity. The ETU confirmed they had no objections to the termination application.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the termination of the Securetel (Aust) Pty. Ltd. and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021. The Commission found the agreement’s expiry date had passed, it did not cover any employees, and the ETU didn't oppose the termination. It also considered that the Employer supports the termination and there are no ongoing enterprise bargaining negotiations. The termination will be effective from July 3, 2026.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they understand the expiry dates of enterprise agreements. Agreements can be terminated if they have expired and do not cover any employees, even if the process requires formal application to the Fair Work Commission.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by an expiring enterprise agreement should be aware of the potential for termination and its impact on their terms and conditions of employment. The ETU confirmed it had no objections to this termination.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1727.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases