Application by Ugl Rts Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1707
What happened
UGL RTS Pty Ltd sought approval to change the UGL and ETU Victorian Rail Infrastructure Enterprise Agreement 2025–2029. The proposed changes, detailed in Annexure A, would provide weekly severance payments for third and fourth-year apprentices into the PROTECT Severance Fund. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia supported the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the proposed variations to the enterprise agreement. the Commissioner found that all relevant requirements under sections 210 and 211 of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. The changes take effect from the date of the decision, December 31, 2025. A consolidated version of the updated agreement is attached to the decision.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they understand their obligations under enterprise agreements and consult with relevant unions when proposing variations. This case highlights a process for formally approving changes to existing agreements through the Fair Work Commission.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by the UGL and ETU Victorian Rail Infrastructure Enterprise Agreement 2025–2029, particularly apprentices in their third or fourth year, will now receive weekly severance payments into the PROTECT Severance Fund. Check the consolidated agreement for full details.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1707.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →