Application by Leahy's Electrical Contracting Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1539
At a glance
- Awards cited
- MA000173
What happened
Leahy's Electrical Contracting Pty Ltd sought approval for the Leahys Electrical Services Enterprise Agreement 2026–2030. The agreement title on the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) didn’t exactly match the formal agreement title. Concerns were raised about apprentice rates being equivalent to the Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2020, questioning whether apprentices would be better off overall. the Respondent provided an undertaking to address this.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Leahys Electrical Services Enterprise Agreement 2026–2030. A minor discrepancy in the agreement title on the NERR was disregarded as it didn't disadvantage employees. To satisfy the Better Off Overall Test (BOOT), the Respondent committed to paying apprentices a rate 2% above the award rate for the agreement’s duration. This undertaking is now a term of the agreement. The agreement will operate from July 1, 2026, and expire on June 24, 2030.
What it means for employers
Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements must ensure consistency between titles used in employee communications and formal documentation. They should also carefully consider the impact of proposed terms on all employees, particularly apprentices, and be prepared to provide undertakings to satisfy the Better Off Overall Test.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by this agreement will receive a payment 2% above the applicable apprentice rate prescribed by the Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2020. It is important for employees to review enterprise agreements carefully and understand their entitlements.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1539.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections