the Applicant v Coronation Property Co Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 725
What happened
the Applicant worked as an Assistant Accountant for the Respondent from August 2022 until December 2025. She was placed on garden leave and her dismissal took effect on 19 December 2025. the Applicant sought compensation or reinstatement following her dismissal. The Respondent, employing approximately 65 people, was not a small business. A performance improvement plan was implemented in July 2025, followed by a written warning. Later, an alleged invoice alteration and reversal was discovered.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted permission for the Respondent to be represented by a lawyer due to the complexity of the case. The decision regarding the unfair dismissal claim itself is not detailed in the provided text. The Commission found there was factual complexity and that granting legal representation to the Respondent would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear role expectations and provide adequate training and support. Regularly review employee performance and provide constructive feedback. It's vital to follow proper procedures when addressing performance concerns, including escalating significant issues. Employers should also ensure staff are familiar with company policies, including the code of conduct.
What it means for employees
Employees should keep records of their duties and responsibilities. If experiencing difficulties, seek clarification and document any inconsistencies in instructions. If placed on a performance improvement plan, ensure expectations are clearly defined and documented. Employees should also be aware of company policies and procedures, including codes of conduct.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc725.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections