Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Health Services Union (051V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3342

What happened

The Health Services Union (HSU) applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application relates to employees of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) covered by the ACT Public Sector Support Services Enterprise Agreement 2023–2026. The ACT did not object, and the parties reached a consent position regarding ballot questions and notice periods. The HSU filed an amended application, accepting exceptional circumstances. True Vote Pty Ltd will conduct the ballot.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the HSU’s application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot will be conducted by True Vote Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent. A voting deadline of September 23, 2026, was set. An extended notice period of five working days applies to employees in food services and ward services taking specific industrial action. A compulsory conciliation conference will be held to facilitate negotiations.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the requirements for protected action ballots, including the need to engage in genuine bargaining and the potential for extended notice periods under exceptional circumstances. Consent positions and amended applications can streamline the process.

What it means for employees

Employees should be informed about upcoming protected action ballots and the industrial action being considered. The extended notice period means employees will have more time to consider the implications of any industrial action.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsprotected-actionindustrial-actionmodern-award-variationconciliation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3342.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases