the Applicant v the Respondent
Citation: [2026] FWC 3333
What happened
the Applicant, a casual delivery driver, was employed by Sydney Freezers Distribution and Storage from November 2022. She sustained an injury in November 2023 and received workers’ compensation. She was dismissed on May 13, 2026, due to her inability to perform the job's inherent requirements after a prolonged absence. She sought an unfair dismissal remedy from the Fair Work Commission.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant was unfairly dismissed. the Respondent did not notify her of the reason for dismissal or give her a chance to respond. While a valid reason for dismissal existed, the lack of procedural fairness meant the dismissal was harsh. Reinstatement was deemed inappropriate, and compensation will be considered.
What it means for employers
Employers must ensure they follow fair procedures when dismissing employees, even casuals. This includes notifying the employee of the reason for dismissal and providing an opportunity to respond. Failing to do so, even with a valid reason, can lead to a finding of unfair dismissal.
What it means for employees
If you are dismissed, you may have grounds for an unfair dismissal claim if the dismissal was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. It’s important to understand your rights and seek advice if you believe you’ve been unfairly dismissed.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3333.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections