Application by Mr Gary Whitham
Citation: [2026] FWC 3322
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
The Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009. He sought anti-bullying orders against Integrated Care Pty Ltd and three coworkers. The Applicant alleged unreasonable behaviour occurred in June and July 2026. This included confusing training, dress code enforcement, questions about his illness, contact while sick, negative work comments, criticism of his home internet, and requests to share his doctor’s information. He requested compensation to transition to new employment.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application. Deputy President Coleman found that the Applicant had not been bullied. The alleged behaviours were not unreasonable, and there was no risk to his health and safety. The Commission could not make an order because the requirements of section 789FF(1)(b) were not met. The Commission also cannot order payments of money. The application was considered to be without merit.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure workplace practices are clear and respectful. Communication regarding training, dress codes, and health information should be handled sensitively. Addressing employee concerns promptly and fairly can prevent formal complaints.
What it means for employees
Employees experiencing workplace issues should document incidents and consider internal resolution processes before pursuing legal action. The Fair Work Commission’s anti-bullying provisions have specific requirements that must be met for orders to be made.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/application-by-mr-gary-whitham-2026-fwc-3322Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections