Application by Ms Maria Bechara
Citation: [2026] FWC 3318
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
The Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission on June 2, 2026, seeking an order to stop bullying at work. The application named Global Legal Proprietary Limited (GLP) and individuals she interacted with while employed there. However, GLP entered liquidation on June 10, 2026, and is no longer trading. The Applicant's employment also ended at this time.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application to stop bullying. The Commissioner found she is no longer employed by GLP and therefore not 'at work' as defined by the Fair Work Act. Consequently, there is no ongoing risk of bullying in a work context. The application was dismissed under section 587(1)(c) of the Act, as it lacked reasonable prospects of success. The decision referenced Shaw v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they understand the definition of 'at work' when considering bullying complaints. The Fair Work Commission’s interpretation means that an employee’s termination can impact the ability to pursue a bullying order.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking protection from bullying must remain employed and 'at work' for the Fair Work Commission to consider an application. If employment has ended, other avenues for addressing bullying behaviour may need to be explored.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/application-by-ms-maria-bechara-2026-fwc-3318Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections