Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by CFMEU (105N)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3305

What happened

The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) applied to the Fair Work Commission to extend the period for protected industrial action. This action relates to matter B2026/871 and a protected action ballot PR812462 declared on August 14, 2026. The CFMEU sought a 30-day extension to the initial 30-day period. ACFS Port Logistics Pty Limited, the employer, did not object to the application.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the CFMEU’s application to extend the period for protected industrial action. Deputy President Hampton ruled that the requirements of section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. The 30-day period for commencing protected industrial action is extended by a further 30 days, effective from September 13, 2026. As stated in paragraph 6, 'I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.'

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the process for protected industrial action and the possibility of applications to extend the timeframe for industrial action. It is important to respond to such applications and raise any objections promptly, as failure to do so can result in the extension being granted by default.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights regarding protected industrial action and the possibility of extensions to the timeframe for commencing industrial action. This can provide additional opportunities to pursue workplace claims through industrial action.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreementprotected-action

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3305.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases