the Applicant v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd
What happened
the Applicant was employed by Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd. Her employment was terminated on April 24, 2026, with the termination date of May 8, 2026. the Applicant filed an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on July 13, 2026, which was more than 21 days after her dismissal. She sought an extension of time to file the application. Coles opposed the extension. the Applicant claims her dismissal was unfair due to her injury and lack of consideration for alternative duties. Coles contends the dismissal was due to her inability to perform the inherent requirements of her position following a neck injury.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission refused the Applicant’s request for an extension of time to file her unfair dismissal application. the Commissioner found no exceptional circumstances warranted the extension. The Commission considered factors like the reason for the delay, whether the Applicant became aware of her dismissal promptly, actions taken to dispute the dismissal, potential prejudice to Coles, the merits of the unfair dismissal claim, and fairness to others. The Commission noted the Applicant’s misunderstanding of the 21-day filing deadline was not exceptional. The Commission will now consider the merits of the Applicant’s unfair dismissal claim.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of the 21-day time limit for filing unfair dismissal applications. While internal dispute resolution processes can occur concurrently, they do not extend the filing deadline. Clear communication regarding termination processes and reasons for dismissal is crucial to avoid misunderstandings and potential disputes.
What it means for employees
Employees must be aware of the 21-day time limit for filing an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission. Seeking internal resolution with the employer does not pause this deadline. If an employee believes they need more time, they must apply for an extension and be prepared to demonstrate exceptional circumstances.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.