Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia (179V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3273

What happened

The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application relates to employees of G4S Australia Pty Ltd. The TWU stated they have been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with G4S. G4S did not object to the application. The ballot will be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the TWU’s application for a protected action ballot order. The Commission was satisfied that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. Voting must close by 10 September 2026. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd is approved to conduct the ballot. A compulsory conciliation conference will be held under section 448A(1).

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they engage in genuine bargaining with unions. Failure to do so may lead to union applications for protected action ballots. The Commission will assess whether parties have genuinely attempted to reach an agreement.

What it means for employees

Employees may have the opportunity to vote in a protected action ballot if bargaining with their employer is ongoing. This allows for potential industrial action to pressure for a better agreement.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreementprotected-action

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3273.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases