the Applicant v My Place WA Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 3254
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced an application under the Fair Work Act 2009 alleging unfair dismissal. Her application was lodged one day outside the 21-day time limit. To proceed, she needed the Fair Work Commission to find exceptional circumstances existed to allow the late filing. the Applicant cited confusion over the filing period, seeking legal advice, and complications from a tooth extraction and related medical treatment as reasons for the delay. She provided an email detailing her medical condition and its impact.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application to deal with her dismissal dispute. the Commissioner found the reasons provided for the delay did not constitute exceptional circumstances. While the delay was short and caused no prejudice to the Respondent, the Commission noted that seeking legal advice is not a sufficient reason for an extension of time. The Commission also found the Applicant did not demonstrate she was incapacitated. The application was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that short delays in lodging applications are unlikely to be considered exceptional circumstances. Seeking legal advice, while prudent, does not automatically justify an extension of time. Employers should also note that the absence of prejudice to the employer is not a guarantee of an extension being granted.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be mindful of the strict 21-day time limit for lodging applications under the Fair Work Act. While seeking legal advice is advisable, it shouldn't cause significant delays. If a delay is unavoidable, employees should gather evidence demonstrating they were unable to file on time due to exceptional circumstances.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3254.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections