Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

the Applicant v Ribshire Pty. Ltd.

Citation: [2026] FWC 3245

What happened

the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on July 28, 2026. The application was not accompanied by the required fee or a fee waiver. The Commission repeatedly notified the Applicant, via phone, SMS, and email, about the outstanding fee and the risk of dismissal if it wasn't paid or a waiver submitted. the Applicant did not respond to these notifications.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commission found he had been given sufficient opportunity to pay the fee or submit a fee waiver form. The decision was made under section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission noted it had the discretion to dismiss the application and that the Applicant disregarded their enquiries and notifications.

What it means for employers

This case highlights the importance of ensuring employees follow the correct procedures when lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Employers should be aware that applications can be dismissed for procedural reasons, such as failure to pay fees.

What it means for employees

Employees must pay the required fee or apply for a fee waiver when lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Failure to do so can result in the application being dismissed, even if the underlying claim has merit. The Commission will provide notifications regarding outstanding fees.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3245.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases