Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia (179V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3242

What happened

The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) to revoke a protected action ballot order. This order, issued on 12 August 2026, related to a dispute with Bevchain Pty Ltd. The ballot was scheduled to close on 31 August 2026. The TWU sought revocation under section 448 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the TWU’s application to revoke the protected action ballot order. the Commissioner found that the requirements of section 448 of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met. This section mandates that the FWC must revoke a protected action ballot order if an application for revocation is made before the ballot closes. The order in B2026/979 was therefore revoked.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the provisions of the Fair Work Act relating to protected action ballots and the possibility of applications for revocation. Understanding the process and potential for changes is crucial for managing industrial action.

What it means for employees

Employees should be informed about any changes to industrial action processes, including the revocation of protected action ballots. This ensures they are aware of their rights and the status of any planned action.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsprotected-actionenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3242.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases