the Applicant v Healthy Solutions Pty. Ltd.
Citation: [2026] FWC 3239
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission against Healthy Solutions Pty. Ltd. She failed to meet deadlines for filing documents and did not attend a non-compliance hearing. The Commission attempted to contact her via phone, email, and express post. She also missed a conciliation conference previously without explanation. the Respondent company applied to have the application dismissed under section 399A of the Fair Work Act.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President Clancy dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application under section 399A of the Fair Work Act. The Deputy President found the Applicant’s failure to comply with directions and attend hearings was unreasonable. She did not provide any explanation for her inaction. The Commission had attempted to contact her multiple times without response. The decision brings the unfair dismissal application to an end.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they follow Fair Work Commission procedures and deadlines. Non-compliance by an employee can lead to an application being dismissed, even if the underlying dispute remains unresolved. Maintaining accurate contact information for employees is also important.
What it means for employees
Employees must adhere to directions and deadlines set by the Fair Work Commission. Failure to do so, without a valid explanation, can result in an application being dismissed. It's crucial to respond to communications from the Commission and attend scheduled hearings.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3239.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections