Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Total Support Services Pty Ltd trading as Total Support Services

Citation: [2026] FWC 3166

What happened

the Applicant worked for OnTrack Tasmania from January 2025. Total Support Services Pty Ltd bought OnTrack Tasmania’s business in December 2025. the Applicant then began working for Total Support Services. He was dismissed in May 2026. the Applicant claimed unfair dismissal and argued his previous service with OnTrack Tasmania should count towards his employment period. Total Support Services disagreed.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commission found Total Support Services clearly informed the Applicant in writing before he started that his previous service would not count towards a qualifying period. This met the requirements of the Fair Work Act.

What it means for employers

Employers purchasing a business must ensure employees are clearly informed about how previous service will be treated. Written contracts can be used to communicate this, but the wording must be unambiguous. Failing to do so could impact an employee’s unfair dismissal protections.

What it means for employees

If your employment transfers to a new business, check if your previous service will be recognised. Review any written agreements carefully to understand how this affects your employment entitlements and qualifying periods.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionstransfer-of-businesspenalty-ratespublic-holidaysredundancyqualifying-periodmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3166.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases