Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia (179V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3152

What happened

The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) applied for an order to hold a protected action ballot for employees of Veolia Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd and Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty Ltd. Veolia objected, stating the union’s bargaining efforts didn't reflect the negotiation's maturity. The Commission considered written submissions and declarations from a TWU official.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission decided to grant the protected action ballot order. The Commission found no basis to contest the application's validity. It noted the TWU must demonstrate it has been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Veolia. The Commission determined the matter based on written submissions without a hearing.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure bargaining processes are well-documented. They need to be prepared to demonstrate the maturity of negotiations if objecting to a protected action ballot order. The Commission will consider whether good faith bargaining obligations are being met.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware that the union can apply for a protected action ballot order to facilitate enterprise bargaining. A ballot order allows employees to vote on whether to take protected industrial action.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsbargainingprotected-actionindustrial-actiongood-faith

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3152.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases