the Applicant v Kokoda Property Group Pty Ltd
What happened
the Applicant, a Director of Commercial Leasing at Kokoda Property Group, applied for an unfair dismissal remedy. He argued he was unfairly dismissed. Kokoda Property Group objected, stating the Applicant wasn't protected from unfair dismissal. the Applicant’s employment began on 28 October 2024 and ended on 27 February 2026. He earned above the high-income threshold and no enterprise agreement applied. The key issue was whether his role was covered by the Real Estate Industry Award 2020.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found Kokoda Property Group was engaged in the real estate industry. However, the Applicant’s role did not fall within a classification covered by the Real Estate Industry Award 2020. Therefore, he was not a person protected from unfair dismissal.
What it means for employers
Employers should review whether their business activities genuinely fall within industry award coverage. A business’s description of its activities is important. Simply buying, selling, or leasing property is not always enough to be considered engaged in the real estate industry. Consider the principal purpose for which an employee is employed.
What it means for employees
Employees should check if their roles are covered by relevant industry awards. Understand the specific classifications and requirements within those awards. A high income and lack of an enterprise agreement can prevent protection from unfair dismissal.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.