the Applicant v Fei Furner Pty. Limited
Citation: [2026] FWC 3124
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant was employed as a cook at Fei Furner Pty. Limited's childcare centre from January 2024, working part-time for $29.57 per hour. On January 22, 2026, an incident occurred involving a child's food and interactions with educators. Following this, the Centre Director contacted the Applicant, stating complaints had been made and requesting she stay home. the Applicant claims she inquired about the complaints and a separation certificate. Fei Furner subsequently sent a letter stating her employment was terminated due to her verbal resignation, which the Applicant denies.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that the Applicant was unfairly dismissed. The Commission determined that Fei Furner Pty. Limited did not have a genuine reason for dismissing her. The company's reliance on a verbal resignation was not substantiated, as the Applicant denied making such a statement. The Commission considered the circumstances surrounding the events of January 22, 2026, and the subsequent communication between the Applicant and the Centre Director. The Commission ordered compensation to be determined at a future hearing.
What it means for employers
Employers must ensure they have a genuine reason for dismissing an employee and follow a fair process. Verbal resignations are difficult to prove and require clear communication and documentation. Employers should investigate complaints thoroughly and provide employees with details before taking disciplinary action. Failing to do so can lead to findings of unfair dismissal.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to understand the reasons for disciplinary action and to respond to allegations. If an employer's actions seem unfair, employees should seek advice and consider making an application to the Fair Work Commission. It is important to document all communications with your employer.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3124.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections