the Applicant v SRT Logistics Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant sought an unfair dismissal remedy from the Fair Work Commission. She had previously agreed to change her employment status from permanent to casual and signed a contract reflecting this change. SRT Logistics Pty Ltd contends the Applicant was not forced to accept the casual employment and did not resign.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found that, objectively, SRT Logistics Pty Ltd’s conduct did not force the Applicant to accept the casual employment offer. The decision was made on 17 August 2026, with reasons provided in the transcript.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees genuinely consent to changes in employment status. Offering casual employment must not be coercive or leave employees feeling they have no alternative but to accept. Documenting agreements is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees should carefully consider any changes to their employment status and ensure they understand the implications. Seek advice if unsure about the terms of a new contract.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.