the Applicant v SRT Logistics Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 3117
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant sought an unfair dismissal remedy from the Fair Work Commission. She had previously agreed to change her employment status from permanent to casual and signed a contract reflecting this change. SRT Logistics Pty Ltd contends the Applicant was not forced to accept the casual employment and did not resign.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found that, objectively, SRT Logistics Pty Ltd’s conduct did not force the Applicant to accept the casual employment offer. The decision was made on 17 August 2026, with reasons provided in the transcript.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees genuinely consent to changes in employment status. Offering casual employment must not be coercive or leave employees feeling they have no alternative but to accept. Documenting agreements is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees should carefully consider any changes to their employment status and ensure they understand the implications. Seek advice if unsure about the terms of a new contract.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3117.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections