the Applicant v 3:16 PTY LTD
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with 3:16 PTY LTD on January 12, 2026, and was dismissed on July 7, 2026. She lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on July 9, 2026. The Commission initially contacted her, noting she hadn't completed the minimum six-month employment period required to make an unfair dismissal claim. Despite being given opportunities to respond and provide information, the Applicant did not submit any further information.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commission found the application had no reasonable prospects of success because the Applicant had not completed the required minimum six-month employment period. The Commission used its power under section 587 of the Fair Work Act to dismiss the application without a full hearing, after providing the Applicant with opportunities to respond. The Deputy President noted that applicants must be given a fair opportunity to show their application has reasonable prospects of success, but this was not possible in this case.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they accurately classify employees and maintain records of their start dates. This is crucial for determining eligibility for unfair dismissal claims. The Commission's willingness to dismiss applications early when minimum requirements aren't met highlights the importance of compliance with employment legislation.
What it means for employees
Employees must meet the minimum employment period before lodging an unfair dismissal claim. If unsure about your eligibility, seek advice before submitting an application. The Commission will assess applications based on provided information and may dismiss them if the minimum requirements aren’t met.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.