Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

the Applicant v Holloway Transport Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 3108

What happened

the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on July 15, 2026. The application was not made correctly because the required application fee was not paid or a fee waiver wasn't provided. The Commission repeatedly contacted the Applicant, requesting payment or a completed fee waiver form, with deadlines provided. Despite these reminders via phone and email, the Applicant did not respond.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. Deputy President Beaumont found the Applicant had been given sufficient opportunity to address the outstanding fee. The Commission used its power under section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 to dismiss the application due to the unpaid fee and lack of response to Commission requests. The application was deemed to be made not in accordance with the Act.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that employees must comply with procedural requirements when lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Failure to pay fees or address outstanding issues can lead to dismissal of the application.

What it means for employees

Employees lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission must pay the required fee or obtain a fee waiver. It is important to respond to any communication from the Commission regarding the application, or risk having it dismissed.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3108.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases