Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V) v Wormald Australia Pty Limited Trading AS Wormald Queensland
Citation: [2026] FWC 3102
What happened
The Applicant sought to resolve a dispute with the Respondent. The dispute concerned payment for Rostered Days Off (RDOs) and the Living Away From Home Allowance (LAHA) under the Wormald South East Queensland Sprinkler Fitters Enterprise Agreement 2023-2027. The Applicant attempted to resolve the dispute at a workplace level and through conciliation, but these efforts were unsuccessful.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission determined it had the jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute. The Commission answered four questions presented by the parties regarding payment for RDOs and LAHA. The decision clarified whether the daily Fares and Travel Allowance applies when an RDO is cashed out or paid out at termination, and when LAHA is payable for travel days. The dispute was determined on the papers.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure their enterprise agreements are clear about payment entitlements for RDOs and LAHA. They should also be aware of how the enterprise agreement interacts with relevant awards, and the potential for conflict between clauses. Employers must also respect the status quo while disputes are being resolved.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of their rights under the enterprise agreement and relevant awards regarding RDOs and LAHA. They should attempt to resolve disputes through the agreed grievance and dispute resolution procedure. Union members have the right to be
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3102.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections