Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

Application by Independent Education Union of Australia (130N)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3091

What happened

The Independent Education Union of Australia (IEUA) applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This relates to employees of Catholic Church Endowment Society Incorporated, operating as Cardijn College, a school managed by Catholic Education SA. Catholic Education SA is subject to a Single Interest Employer Authorisation (SIEA) for a proposed multi-enterprise agreement. The IEUA has made similar applications for other employers under the same SIEA. the Respondent did not object to the application, but previously reserved its position on the ballot scope and questions.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the IEUA’s application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot will be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent. Voting must close by August 27, 2026. A separate order (PR813254) has been issued. A compulsory conciliation conference will be held to facilitate negotiations for the proposed enterprise agreement, with directions likely to ensure meaningful engagement.

What it means for employers

Employers covered by Single Interest Employer Authorisations should be aware of the potential for union applications for protected action ballots, particularly during enterprise bargaining negotiations. Reserving positions on ballot scope and questions, as Catholic Education SA did, may not prevent a ballot order but could influence its parameters.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the proposed enterprise agreement may have the opportunity to vote in a protected action ballot. This allows them to take protected industrial action to advance their bargaining position.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationprotected-action

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3091.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases